Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 31 shared benchmark results across 7 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

60/100
Margin
1.0pts
winning →
60.99/100
0 category wins6 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Ultra #24; Qwen3.7 Max #2

BenchAlign evidence: Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored; Qwen3.7 Max estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Max share 31 comparable benchmark results. 6 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Ultra; 26 to Qwen3.7 Max.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
31
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
8
Qwen3.7 Max only
26
Comparable categories
6 / 8

Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Ultra only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 31 shared benchmark results across 7 evidence categories; 6 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen3.7 Max is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.7 Max's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 90.4 against 61.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 26.7% to 41.4%.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Max
CategoryNemotron 3 UltraΔQwen3.7 Max
ReasoningNemotron 3 Ultra61.9Margin→ 28.5Qwen3.7 Max90.4
CodingNemotron 3 Ultra58.3Margin→ 19.6Qwen3.7 Max77.9
AgenticNemotron 3 Ultra51.3Margin→ 18.4Qwen3.7 Max69.7
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Ultra54.2Margin→ 10.3Qwen3.7 Max64.5
MultilingualNemotron 3 Ultra83.0Margin→ 4.0Qwen3.7 Max87.0
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Ultra81.7Margin→ 2.7Qwen3.7 Max84.4
MathNemotron 3 UltraNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max97.1

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Nemotron 3 UltraB · Qwen3.7 Max

  1. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 26.7%B 41.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 14.7
    HLE: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 26.7%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 41.4%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  2. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 56.4%B 69.7%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 13.3
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 56.4%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 69.7%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  3. SciCode

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 44.6%B 53.5%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 8.9
    SciCode: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 44.6%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 53.5%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  4. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 71.9%B 80.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 8.5
    SWE-bench Verified: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 71.9%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 80.4%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  5. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 87%B 92.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 5.4
    GPQA: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 87%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 92.4%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 UltraNot availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 UltraNot availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Ultra1MQwen3.7 Max1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 MaxResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%69.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
PinchBenchSource 90.0%—Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 44.4%—Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 70.9%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.2%38.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
HLE w/ toolsSource 37.4%53.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 27.4%30.6%Qwen3.7 Max leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 83.3%94.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GDPval-AASource 11641273Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA BriefcaseSource 870908Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 28.9%45.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA Harvey LABSource 3.3%—Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —64.3%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1568Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —65.2%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —75.0%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —76.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —47.9%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource —64.27%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource —18.7%Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource —25.6%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource —42.5%Not comparable
CodingQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 MaxResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 71.9%80.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
SWE MultilingualSource 67.7%78.3%Qwen3.7 Max leads
LiveCodeBench v6Source 89.0%—Not comparable
SciCodeSource 44.6%53.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%69.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA Coding IndexSource 49.3%66.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Terminal-Bench HardSource 36.4%50.8%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-SciCodeSource 39.9%48.8%Qwen3.7 Max leads
SWE-bench ProSource —60.6%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —47.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —91.6%Not comparable
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source —74.5%Not comparable
ReasoningQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 MaxResult
AA-LCRSource 67.0%69.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
CritPtSource 3.1%13.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
LongBench v2Source 61.9%—Not comparable
MRCRv2Source —90.4%Not comparable
KnowledgeQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 MaxResult
GPQASource 87%92.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GPQA-DSource 87.0%92.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
HLESource 26.7%41.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
HLE w/o toolsSource 26.7%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 86.8%89.6%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 21.6%30.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 37.8%46.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.7%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-HLESource 26.6%38.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -0.8%14.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 28.5%22.9%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA Openness IndexSource 83.3%—Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —95%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —73.6%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —90.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 MaxResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source —97.1%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —90.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —44.5%Not comparable
MultilingualQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 MaxResult
MMLU-ProXSource 83%87%Qwen3.7 Max leads
NOVA-63Source —59.0%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —86.2%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —89.2%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —86.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 MaxResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 11321296Qwen3.7 Max leads
Inst. FollowingQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 MaxResult
IFBenchSource 81.7%79.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-IFBenchSource 81.4%80.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
IFEvalSource —94.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (7)

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 26.7% and 41.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 64.5 versus 54.2. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.9 versus 58.3. Inside this category, AA Coding Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 90.4 versus 61.9. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.7 versus 51.3. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 84.4 versus 81.7. Inside this category, IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 83. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

NVIDIA Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.