Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Nova Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Nova Pro
Amazon
20.32/100
Margin
46.9pts
winning →
67.22/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nova Pro #196 (Supported); Qwen3.7 Plus #21 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nova Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Nova Pro; 57 to Qwen3.7 Plus.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
Nova Pro only
0
Qwen3.7 Plus only
57
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Nova Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Nova Pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nova Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus
CategoryNova ProΔQwen3.7 Plus
AgenticNova ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus71.7
CodingNova ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus75.6
ReasoningNova ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus91.7
KnowledgeNova ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus60.1
MathNova ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus92.9
MultilingualNova ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus85.4
MultimodalNova ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus81.5
Inst. FollowingNova ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus84.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNova ProQwen3.7 PlusComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNova ProNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondNova Pro141 tok/sQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNova Pro0.81 sQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNova Pro128KQwen3.7 Plus1MQwen3.7 Plus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 14%93%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —70.3%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —61.8%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1536Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —62.7%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —72.9%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —73.2%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —45.6%Not comparable
DeepPlanningSource —62.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —73.3%Not comparable
AndroidWorldSource —81.0%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —20.8%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —22.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —21.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —936Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source —2.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
AA-SciCodeSource 20.8%45.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —70.3%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —77.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —57.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —75.8%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —41.1%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —51.3%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —89.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —55.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
AA-LCRSource 19.0%65.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
CritPtSource 0.0%9.1%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
MRCRv2Source —91.7%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 7.7%39.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 49.9%90.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-HLESource 3.4%33.4%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -47.6%2.4%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.0%22.2%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 77.9%25.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
GPQASource —90.3%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource —90.3%Not comparable
HLESource —34.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource —88.5%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —94.5%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —71.4%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —89.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source —92.9%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —86.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —22.7%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMLU-ProXSource —85.4%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —58.8%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —83.0%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —88.8%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —84.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 44.3%80.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
MMMU-ProSource —79%Not comparable
MathVisionSource —90.3%Not comparable
CharXivSource —85.9%Not comparable
ERQASource —69.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source —71.0%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource —79.0%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource —81.7%Not comparable
MMSearch-PlusSource —41.4%Not comparable
RealWorldQASource —86.9%Not comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5Source —91.4%Not comparable
OCRBench V2Source —70.7%Not comparable
ODINW13Source —51.1%Not comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source —88.0%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource —85.4%Not comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)Source —87.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1288Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.7 PlusResult
AA-IFBenchSource 38.1%78.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
IFEvalSource —94.6%Not comparable
IFBenchSource —79.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Nova Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Nova Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus today?

Nova Pro: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Amazon Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.