Model comparison
Nova Pro vs Soofi S 30B-A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Nova Pro and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to Nova Pro; 8 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.
Updated July 15, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Nova Pro only
- 13
- Soofi S 30B-A3B only
- 8
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Nova Pro and Soofi S 30B-A3B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Soofi S 30B-A3B has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Nova Pro.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Nova Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Nova ProNot available | Soofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Nova Pro141 tok/s | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Nova Pro0.81 s | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Nova Pro128K | Soofi S 30B-A3B1M | Soofi S 30B-A3B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 14% | — | Not comparable |
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning4 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 7.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 49.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 3.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -47.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 17.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 77.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 43.4% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 43.4% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 51.4% | Not comparable |
| AGIEvalSource | — | 66.9% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8KSource | — | 86.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 44.3% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova Pro | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 38.1% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Nova Pro and Soofi S 30B-A3B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Nova Pro and Soofi S 30B-A3B today?
Nova Pro: Pricing unavailable Soofi S 30B-A3B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.