Skip to main content

Model comparison

o1-pro vs Qwen2.5-1M

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
OpenAI
45.03/100
No comparison
Alibaba
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: o1-pro #148 (Estimated); Qwen2.5-1M #125 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. o1-pro and Qwen2.5-1M share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to o1-pro; 0 to Qwen2.5-1M.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
o1-pro only
2
Qwen2.5-1M only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for o1-pro and Qwen2.5-1M is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Qwen2.5-1M yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

o1-pro is priced at $150.00 input / $600.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen2.5-1M. Qwen2.5-1M has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o1-pro.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

Metrico1-proQwen2.5-1MComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokenso1-pro$150 input / $600 outputQwen2.5-1M$0 input / $0 outputQwen2.5-1M has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondo1-proNot availableQwen2.5-1MNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokeno1-proNot availableQwen2.5-1MNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokenso1-pro200KQwen2.5-1M1MQwen2.5-1M lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Knowledge
Benchmarko1-proQwen2.5-1MResult
GPQASource 79%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 18.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare o1-pro and Qwen2.5-1M on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for o1-pro and Qwen2.5-1M today?

o1-pro: $150.00 input / $600.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen2.5-1M: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026