Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

o1-pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

o1-pro
OpenAI
45.94/100
Margin
21.3pts
winning →
67.22/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: o1-pro #141 (Estimated); Qwen3.7 Plus #21 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. o1-pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to o1-pro; 67 to Qwen3.7 Plus.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
2
o1-pro only
0
Qwen3.7 Plus only
67
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen3.7 Plus is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 67.22 to 45.94. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.7 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o1-pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for o1-pro and Qwen3.7 Plus
Categoryo1-proΔQwen3.7 Plus
Knowledgeo1-pro79.0Margin← 18.9Qwen3.7 Plus60.1
Agentico1-proNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus71.7
Codingo1-proNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus75.6
Reasoningo1-proNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus91.7
Matho1-proNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus92.9
Multilingualo1-proNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus85.4
Multimodalo1-proNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus81.5
Inst. Followingo1-proNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus84.5

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · o1-proB · Qwen3.7 Plus

  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 79%B 90.3%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 11.3
    GPQA: o1-pro scored 79%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 90.3%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

Metrico1-proQwen3.7 PlusComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokenso1-pro$150 input / $600 outputQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondo1-proNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokeno1-proNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokenso1-pro200KQwen3.7 Plus1MQwen3.7 Plus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
Benchmarko1-proQwen3.7 PlusResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —70.3%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —61.8%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1536Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —62.7%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —72.9%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —73.2%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —45.6%Not comparable
DeepPlanningSource —62.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —73.3%Not comparable
AndroidWorldSource —81.0%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —20.8%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —22.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —93%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —21.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —936Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source —2.8%Not comparable
Coding
Benchmarko1-proQwen3.7 PlusResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —70.3%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —77.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —57.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —75.8%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —41.1%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —51.3%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —89.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —55.9%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —45.5%Not comparable
Reasoning
Benchmarko1-proQwen3.7 PlusResult
CritPtSource —9.1%Not comparable
MRCRv2Source —91.7%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource —65.0%Not comparable
Knowledgeo1-pro wins
Benchmarko1-proQwen3.7 PlusResult
GPQASource 79%90.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 18.9%39.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
GPQA-DSource —90.3%Not comparable
HLESource —34.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource —88.5%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —94.5%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —71.4%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —89.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —90.0%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —33.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —2.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —22.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —25.5%Not comparable
Math
Benchmarko1-proQwen3.7 PlusResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source —92.9%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —86.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —22.7%Not comparable
Multilingual
Benchmarko1-proQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMLU-ProXSource —85.4%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —58.8%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —83.0%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —88.8%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —84.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
Benchmarko1-proQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMMU-ProSource —79%Not comparable
MathVisionSource —90.3%Not comparable
CharXivSource —85.9%Not comparable
ERQASource —69.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source —71.0%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource —79.0%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource —81.7%Not comparable
MMSearch-PlusSource —41.4%Not comparable
RealWorldQASource —86.9%Not comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5Source —91.4%Not comparable
OCRBench V2Source —70.7%Not comparable
ODINW13Source —51.1%Not comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source —88.0%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource —85.4%Not comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)Source —87.4%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource —80.5%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1288Not comparable
Inst. Following
Benchmarko1-proQwen3.7 PlusResult
IFEvalSource —94.6%Not comparable
IFBenchSource —79.1%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource —78.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, o1-pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 67.22 to 45.94. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 79% and 90.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, o1-pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

o1-pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 79 versus 60.1. Inside this category, Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

OpenAI Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.