Skip to main content

Model comparison

o3-mini vs Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
OpenAI
46.59/100
Margin
10.7pts
winning →
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: o3-mini #141 (Supported); Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) #72 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. o3-mini and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to o3-mini; 2 to Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
o3-mini only
10
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for o3-mini and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

o3-mini is priced at $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning). o3-mini has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

Metrico3-miniQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokenso3-mini$1.1 input / $4.4 outputQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 outputQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondo3-mini160 tok/sQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokeno3-mini7.12 sQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokenso3-mini200KQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)128Ko3-mini lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 28.7%Not comparable
Coding
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 49.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 39.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
MMLUSource 86.9%Not comparable
GPQASource 77.2%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 74.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 8.7%Not comparable
Math
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
AIME 2024Source 87.3%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 8.481%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Inst. Following
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
IFEvalSource 93.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare o3-mini and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for o3-mini and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) today?

o3-mini: $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning): $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026