Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
o3-mini
56
Qwen3.7 Max
93
Verified leaderboard positions: o3-mini unranked · Qwen3.7 Max #2
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Coding
+24.3 difference
Knowledge
+6.0 difference
Inst. Following
+4.9 difference
o3-mini
Qwen3.7 Max
$1.1 / $4.4
$null / $null
160 t/s
N/A
7.12s
N/A
200K
1M
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Qwen3.7 Max is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.7 Max's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 73.6 against 49.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 49.3% to 80.4%. o3-mini does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Qwen3.7 Max gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o3-mini.
Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 49.3% and 80.4%.
o3-mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 71.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.6 versus 49.3. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-mini has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.9 versus 89. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.