Skip to main content

Model comparison

o3-mini vs Soofi S 30B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

OpenAI
53/100
Margin
8.0pts
← winning
Soofi Project
45/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. o3-mini and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to o3-mini; 7 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
1
o3-mini only
10
Soofi S 30B-A3B only
7
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick o3-mini if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

o3-mini is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 53 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

o3-mini's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 77.2 against 49.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 77.2% to 43.4%.

o3-mini is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Soofi S 30B-A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. o3-mini is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Soofi S 30B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o3-mini.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for o3-mini and Soofi S 30B-A3B
Categoryo3-miniΔSoofi S 30B-A3B
Knowledgeo3-mini77.2Margin 27.3Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9
Codingo3-mini49.3MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
Inst. Followingo3-mini93.9MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · o3-miniB · Soofi S 30B-A3B
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 77.2%B 43.4%
    Winner: o3-miniΔ 33.8
    GPQA: o3-mini scored 77.2%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 43.4%. o3-mini wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

Metrico3-miniSoofi S 30B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokenso3-mini$1.1 input / $4.4 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondo3-mini160 tok/sSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokeno3-mini7.12 sSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokenso3-mini200KSoofi S 30B-A3B1MSoofi S 30B-A3B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
Benchmarko3-miniSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 28.7%Not comparable
Coding
Benchmarko3-miniSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 49.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 6.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 39.9%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 73.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
Benchmarko3-miniSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
BBHSource 78.8%Not comparable
DROPSource 66.5%Not comparable
Knowledgeo3-mini wins
Benchmarko3-miniSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
MMLUSource 86.9%Not comparable
GPQASource 77.2%43.4%o3-mini leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 74.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 8.7%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 43.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 51.4%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 66.9%Not comparable
Math
Benchmarko3-miniSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
AIME 2024Source 87.3%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 86.1%Not comparable
Inst. Following
Benchmarko3-miniSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
IFEvalSource 93.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, o3-mini or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

o3-mini is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 53 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 77.2% and 43.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, o3-mini or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

o3-mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 49.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.