o4-mini (high) vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Agentic
Coding
Multimodal & Grounded
Reasoning
Knowledge
Instruction Following
Multilingual
Mathematics

o4-mini (high)· Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o4-mini (high) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 71 to 58. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 76.3 against 44.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LiveCodeBench, 34% to 78.9%. o4-mini (high) does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for o4-mini (high).

Operational tradeoffs

PricePricing unavailableFree*
Speed161 t/sN/A
TTFT21.94sN/A
Context200K262K

Decision framing

BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.

Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.

Benchmarko4-mini (high)Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Agentico4-mini (high) wins
Terminal-Bench 2.058%49.4%
BrowseComp64%63.8%
OSWorld-Verified55%58%
tau2-bench79.5%
CodingQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins
HumanEval74%
SWE-bench Verified68.1%72%
LiveCodeBench34%78.9%
SWE-bench Pro42%
Multimodal & GroundedQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins
MMMU-Pro66%76.9%
OfficeQA Pro71%
ReasoningQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins
MuSR78%
BBH83%
LongBench v275%60.2%
MRCRv274%
ARC-AGI-22.4%
KnowledgeQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins
MMLU82%
GPQA82%86.6%
SuperGPQA80%67.1%
MMLU-Pro76%86.7%
HLE13%
FrontierScience73%
SimpleQA80%
Instruction FollowingQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins
IFEval83%93.4%
MultilingualQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins
MGSM83%
MMLU-ProX81%82.2%
Mathematics
AIME 202383%
AIME 202493.4%
AIME 202592.7%
HMMT Feb 202379%
HMMT Feb 202481%
HMMT Feb 202580%
BRUMO 202582%
MATH-50084%
Frequently Asked Questions (8)

Which is better, o4-mini (high) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is ahead overall, 71 to 58. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LiveCodeBench, where the scores are 34% and 78.9%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, o4-mini (high) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 62.7. Inside this category, SuperGPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, o4-mini (high) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 76.3 versus 44.9. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, o4-mini (high) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 60.2 versus 57.2. Inside this category, LongBench v2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, o4-mini (high) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

o4-mini (high) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 58.5 versus 56. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, o4-mini (high) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.9 versus 68.3. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, o4-mini (high) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.4 versus 83. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, o4-mini (high) or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.2 versus 81.7. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 31, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.