Model comparison
Ornith-1.0-35B vs SWE-1.7
Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Ornith-1.0-35B and SWE-1.7 share 3 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Ornith-1.0-35B; 1 to SWE-1.7.
Updated July 18, 2026- Shared results
- 3
- Ornith-1.0-35B only
- 4
- SWE-1.7 only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Ornith-1.0-35B makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; SWE-1.7 is the better fit if agentic is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Ornith-1.0-35B and SWE-1.7 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Ornith-1.0-35B | Δ | SWE-1.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Ornith-1.0-35B64.2 | Margin→ 17.3 | SWE-1.781.5 |
| Coding | Ornith-1.0-35B65.9 | MarginNo overlap | SWE-1.7Not measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 64.2%B 81.5%Winner: SWE-1.7Δ 17.3Terminal-Bench 2.0: Ornith-1.0-35B scored 64.2%; SWE-1.7 scored 81.5%. SWE-1.7 wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Ornith-1.0-35B | SWE-1.7 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Ornith-1.0-35B$0 input / $0 output | SWE-1.7Not available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Ornith-1.0-35BNot available | SWE-1.7Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Ornith-1.0-35BNot available | SWE-1.7Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Ornith-1.0-35B256K | SWE-1.7256K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticSWE-1.7 wins2 benchmarks
Coding6 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Ornith-1.0-35B or SWE-1.7?
Ornith-1.0-35B and SWE-1.7 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Ornith-1.0-35B or SWE-1.7?
SWE-1.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 64.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.