Skip to main content

Model comparison

Ornith-1.0-397B vs Qwen2.5-1M

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
DeepReinforce AI
N/A
No comparison
Alibaba
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Ornith-1.0-397B unranked (Not scored); Qwen2.5-1M #120 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen2.5-1M share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to Ornith-1.0-397B; 0 to Qwen2.5-1M.

Updated July 18, 2026
Shared results
0
Ornith-1.0-397B only
7
Qwen2.5-1M only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen2.5-1M is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Qwen2.5-1M yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Qwen2.5-1M has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Ornith-1.0-397B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricOrnith-1.0-397BQwen2.5-1MComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensOrnith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 outputQwen2.5-1M$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableQwen2.5-1MNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableQwen2.5-1MNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensOrnith-1.0-397B256KQwen2.5-1M1MQwen2.5-1M lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkOrnith-1.0-397BQwen2.5-1MResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 77.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkOrnith-1.0-397BQwen2.5-1MResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 82.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 62.2%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 78.9%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 48.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen2.5-1M on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen2.5-1M today?

Ornith-1.0-397B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen2.5-1M: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 18, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.