Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Ornith-1.0-397B
96
Qwen3.5-27B
61
Verified leaderboard positions: Ornith-1.0-397B unranked · Qwen3.5-27B #23
Pick Ornith-1.0-397B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-27B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+25.9 difference
Coding
+19.4 difference
Ornith-1.0-397B
Qwen3.5-27B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
262K
262K
Pick Ornith-1.0-397B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-27B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Ornith-1.0-397B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 96 to 61. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Ornith-1.0-397B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 77.5 against 51.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 77.5% to 41.6%.
Ornith-1.0-397B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 96 to 61. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 77.5% and 41.6%.
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 82.4 versus 63. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 51.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.