Model comparison
Ornith-1.0-397B vs Step 3.7 Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Ornith-1.0-397B unranked (Not scored); Step 3.7 Flash #107 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Ornith-1.0-397B and Step 3.7 Flash share 4 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Ornith-1.0-397B; 26 to Step 3.7 Flash.
Updated July 17, 2026- Shared results
- 4
- Ornith-1.0-397B only
- 3
- Step 3.7 Flash only
- 26
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Pick Ornith-1.0-397B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Step 3.7 Flash only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Ornith-1.0-397B is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 72 to 50.76. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Ornith-1.0-397B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 74.6 against 56.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 77.5% to 59.5%.
Step 3.7 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ornith-1.0-397B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Ornith-1.0-397B | Δ | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Ornith-1.0-397B74.6 | Margin← 18.3 | Step 3.7 Flash56.3 |
| Agentic | Ornith-1.0-397B77.5 | Margin← 11.1 | Step 3.7 Flash66.4 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 77.5%B 59.5%Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 18Terminal-Bench 2.0: Ornith-1.0-397B scored 77.5%; Step 3.7 Flash scored 59.5%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Pro
CodingA 62.2%B 56.3%Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 5.9SWE-bench Pro: Ornith-1.0-397B scored 62.2%; Step 3.7 Flash scored 56.3%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Ornith-1.0-397B | Step 3.7 Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Ornith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 output | Step 3.7 Flash$0.2 input / $1.15 output | Ornith-1.0-397B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | Step 3.7 FlashNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | Step 3.7 FlashNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Ornith-1.0-397B256K | Step 3.7 Flash256K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticOrnith-1.0-397B wins12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Ornith-1.0-397B | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 77.5% | 59.5% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| Claw-EvalSource | 77.1% | 67.1% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 75.8% | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | — | 92.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 25.9% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 49.5% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 47.2% | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 51.57% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 21.5% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 98.5% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1017 | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 14.8% | Not comparable |
CodingOrnith-1.0-397B wins8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Ornith-1.0-397B | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 82.4% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | 62.2% | 56.3% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| SWE MultilingualSource | 78.9% | — | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | 48.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 77.5% | 59.5% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 39.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | — | 35.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 40.0% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Ornith-1.0-397B | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 30.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 80.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 19.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -37.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 25.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 84.4% | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Ornith-1.0-397B | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 67.3% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, Ornith-1.0-397B or Step 3.7 Flash?
Ornith-1.0-397B is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 72 to 50.76. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 77.5% and 59.5%.
Which is better for coding, Ornith-1.0-397B or Step 3.7 Flash?
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.6 versus 56.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Ornith-1.0-397B or Step 3.7 Flash?
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 66.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.