Agentic
Not comparable- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Qwen3.5-27B
- 52.0
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 3 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Model comparison
Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Qwen3.5-27B
Updated August 4, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. Use the documented cost, context, and runtime rows instead.
0 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: rate-fallback
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
7 Pokee-Isaac 28B only
16 Qwen3.5-27B only
- Shared results
- 0
- Pokee-Isaac 28B only
- 7
- Qwen3.5-27B only
- 16
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.
Coding
Not comparable- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Qwen3.5-27B
- 64.9
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 2 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- 60.7
- Qwen3.5-27B
- 60.6
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Qwen3.5-27B
- 82.7
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 3 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Qwen3.5-27B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Qwen3.5-27B
- 82.2
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Qwen3.5-27B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- Not measured
- Qwen3.5-27B
- 95.0
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Pokee-Isaac 28B | Qwen3.5-27B | Weighted basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Not measured | 52.0 | Not comparable0 vs 3 rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | Not measured | 64.9 | Not comparable0 vs 2 rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | 60.7 | 60.6 | Not comparable1 vs 1 rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | Not measured | 82.7 | Not comparable0 vs 3 rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not measured | 82.2 | Not comparable0 vs 1 rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not measured | 95.0 | Not comparable0 vs 1 rows | Not comparable |
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
A shared-evidence shape is not available.
BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- $0.00065
- Fits in one request
- Qwen3.5-27B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-27B has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- $0.0105
- Fits in one request
- Qwen3.5-27B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-27B has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Pokee-Isaac 28B
- $0.043
- Fits in one request
- Cached input priced at the published list-input rate
- Qwen3.5-27B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Pokee-Isaac 28B has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate. Qwen3.5-27B has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationPokee-Isaac 28BQwen3.5-27B
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Qwen3.5-27B
262K
API model ID
Pokee-Isaac 28B
pokee-isaac
Pokee-Isaac 28B model pageQwen3.5-27B
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Not published
Pokee-Isaac 28B model pageQwen3.5-27B
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Not sourced
Qwen3.5-27B
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Not sourced
Qwen3.5-27B
Not sourced
Provider availability
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Not sourced
Qwen3.5-27B
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Reasoning
Qwen3.5-27B
Reasoning
Weight access
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Proprietary
Qwen3.5-27B
Open Weight
License
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Proprietary
Qwen3.5-27B
Open Weight
Release date
Pokee-Isaac 28B
2026-08-03
Qwen3.5-27B
2026-03-04
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented window (10M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence23 rows
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Pokee-Isaac 28B65.1%SourceQwen3.5-27B—Not directly comparable
BFCL v4
Pokee-Isaac 28B70.9%SourceQwen3.5-27B—Not directly comparable
τ³-bench results
Pokee-Isaac 28B66.2%SourceQwen3.5-27B—Not directly comparable
MCP-Atlas claim coverage
Pokee-Isaac 28B74.6%SourceQwen3.5-27B—Not directly comparable
PinchBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B95.7%SourceQwen3.5-27B—Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Pokee-Isaac 28B—Qwen3.5-27B41.6%SourceNot directly comparable
BrowseComp
Pokee-Isaac 28B—Qwen3.5-27B61%SourceNot directly comparable
OSWorld-Verified
Pokee-Isaac 28B—Qwen3.5-27B56.2%SourceNot directly comparable
Gert Labs
Pokee-Isaac 28B—Qwen3.5-27B39.41%SourceNot directly comparable
Coding
Reasoning
Knowledge
Multilingual
MMLU-ProX
Pokee-Isaac 28B—Qwen3.5-27B82.2%SourceNot directly comparable
Multimodal
Instruction following
IFEval
Pokee-Isaac 28B—Qwen3.5-27B95%SourceNot directly comparable
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.5-27B?
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.5-27B?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted coding basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a coding winner.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.5-27B?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted agentic tasks basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a agentic tasks winner.
Which costs less, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.5-27B?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.5-27B?
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented context window: 10M, compared with 262K.
Related comparisons
Last updated August 4, 2026
Watch Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Qwen3.5-27B
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.