Model comparison

Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Qwen3.7 Max

Updated August 4, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Pokee AI

—

Evidence status unavailable

90% interval unavailable

Qwen3.7 Max

Alibaba

71.8/100

Supported · Public rank #13

90% interval 65.4–78.2

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.

2 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented

Show secondary and unsupported calls

Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: rate-fallback
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

5 Pokee-Isaac 28B only

2 Shared

33 Qwen3.7 Max only

Shared results: 2
Pokee-Isaac 28B only: 5
Qwen3.7 Max only: 33
Like-for-like categories: 1 / 8

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.

Reasoning

Like-for-like

Pokee-Isaac 28B: 60.7
Qwen3.7 Max: 90.4
Weighted basis: 1 vs 1 rows
Reading: Qwen3.7 Max leads

Agentic

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.7 Max: 69.7
Weighted basis: 0 vs 1 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Coding

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.7 Max: 77.9
Weighted basis: 0 vs 4 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Knowledge

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.7 Max: 64.2
Weighted basis: 0 vs 4 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Math

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.7 Max: 97.1
Weighted basis: 0 vs 1 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.7 Max: 87.0
Weighted basis: 0 vs 1 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.7 Max: Not measured
Weighted basis: 0 vs 0 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.7 Max: 84.4
Weighted basis: 0 vs 2 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Category averages with the server-provided evidence basis for Pokee-Isaac 28B and Qwen3.7 Max
Category	Pokee-Isaac 28B	Qwen3.7 Max	Weighted basis	Reading
Reasoning	60.7	90.4	Like-for-like1 vs 1 rows	Qwen3.7 Max leads
Agentic	Not measured	69.7	Not comparable0 vs 1 rows	Not comparable
Coding	Not measured	77.9	Not comparable0 vs 4 rows	Not comparable
Knowledge	Not measured	64.2	Not comparable0 vs 4 rows	Not comparable
Math	Not measured	97.1	Not comparable0 vs 1 rows	Not comparable
Multilingual	Not measured	87.0	Not comparable0 vs 1 rows	Not comparable
Multimodal	Not measured	Not measured	Not comparable0 vs 0 rows	Not comparable
Instruction following	Not measured	84.4	Not comparable0 vs 2 rows	Not comparable

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.

MRCRv2
Reasoning
Pokee-Isaac 28B: 60.7%Qwen3.7 Max: 90.4%Normalized gap 29.7Pokee-Isaac 28B source Qwen3.7 Max source

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Pokee-Isaac 28B: $0.00065; Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max: API rate not published; Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Max has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Pokee-Isaac 28B: $0.0105; Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max: API rate not published; Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Max has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Pokee-Isaac 28B: $0.043; Fits in one request; Cached input priced at the published list-input rate
Qwen3.7 Max: API rate not published; Fits in one request; Cached-input rate unavailable

Pokee-Isaac 28B has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate. Qwen3.7 Max has no comparable published API token rate.

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

SpecificationPokee-Isaac 28BQwen3.7 Max

Context window

Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.

Pokee-Isaac 28B

10M

Pokee-Isaac 28B model page

Qwen3.7 Max

API model ID

Pokee-Isaac 28B

pokee-isaac

Pokee-Isaac 28B model page

Qwen3.7 Max

Not sourced

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Not published

Pokee-Isaac 28B model page

Qwen3.7 Max

No comparable hosted API rate

Documented inputs

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Max

Not sourced

Documented outputs

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Max

Not sourced

Provider availability

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Max

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Reasoning

Qwen3.7 Max

Reasoning

Weight access

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Proprietary

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

License

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Proprietary

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Release date

Pokee-Isaac 28B

2026-08-03

Qwen3.7 Max

2026-05-16

If you already use one of these models

Deployment change: The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal: At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
Workload cost: A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff: Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented window (10M).

Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence40 rows

Agentic

Terminal-Bench 2.1
Pokee-Isaac 28B65.1%
Source
Qwen3.7 Max—
Not directly comparable
BFCL v4
Pokee-Isaac 28B70.9%
Source
Qwen3.7 Max75.0%
Source
Qwen3.7 Max leads this result
τ³-bench results
Pokee-Isaac 28B66.2%
Source
Qwen3.7 Max—
Not directly comparable
MCP-Atlas claim coverage
Pokee-Isaac 28B74.6%
Source
Qwen3.7 Max—
Not directly comparable
PinchBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B95.7%
Source
Qwen3.7 Max—
Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max69.7%
Source
Not directly comparable
QwenClawBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max64.3%
Source
Not directly comparable
Claw-Eval
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max65.2%
Source
Not directly comparable
MCP Atlas
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max76.4%
Source
Not directly comparable
VITA-Bench
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max47.9%
Source
Not directly comparable
HLE w/ tools
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max53.5%
Source
Not directly comparable
Gert Labs
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max64.27%
Source
Not directly comparable
ResearchClawBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max18.7%
Source
Not directly comparable

Coding

Terminal-Bench 2.1
Pokee-Isaac 28B65.1%
Source
Qwen3.7 Max—
Not directly comparable
SWE-bench Verified
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max80.4%
Source
Not directly comparable
SWE-bench Pro
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max60.6%
Source
Not directly comparable
SWE Multilingual
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max78.3%
Source
Not directly comparable
NL2Repo
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max47.2%
Source
Not directly comparable
SciCode
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max53.5%
Source
Not directly comparable
LiveCodeBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max91.6%
Source
Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max69.7%
Source
Not directly comparable

Reasoning

MRCRv2
Pokee-Isaac 28B60.7%
Source
Qwen3.7 Max90.4%
Source
Qwen3.7 Max leads this result
CritPt
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max13.4%
Source
Not directly comparable

Knowledge

GPQA
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max92.4%
Source
Not directly comparable
GPQA-D
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max92.4%
Source
Not directly comparable
HLE
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max41.4%
Source
Not directly comparable
MMLU-Pro
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max89.6%
Source
Not directly comparable
MMLU-Redux
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max95%
Source
Not directly comparable
SuperGPQA
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max73.6%
Source
Not directly comparable
MMMLU
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max90.3%
Source
Not directly comparable

Math

HMMT Feb 2026
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max97.1%
Source
Not directly comparable
IMOAnswerBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max90.0%
Source
Not directly comparable
Apex
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max44.5%
Source
Not directly comparable

Multilingual

MMLU-ProX
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max87%
Source
Not directly comparable
NOVA-63
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max59.0%
Source
Not directly comparable
INCLUDE
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max86.2%
Source
Not directly comparable
MAXIFE
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max89.2%
Source
Not directly comparable
PolyMath
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max86.5%
Source
Not directly comparable

Instruction following

IFEval
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max94.3%
Source
Not directly comparable
IFBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.7 Max79.1%
Source
Not directly comparable

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.7 Max?

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.

Which is better for coding, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.7 Max?

The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted coding basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a coding winner.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.7 Max?

The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted agentic tasks basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a agentic tasks winner.

Which costs less, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented context window: 10M, compared with 1M.

Related comparisons

Compare API pricing Read the methodology Open the model selector

Last updated August 4, 2026

Watch Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Qwen3.7 Max

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.

Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Qwen3.7 Max

Which one for your work

Long documents

Coding work

Agentic work

Chat turn cost

Cache-heavy agent loop cost

Repository review cost

What is actually comparable

Category results, on a stated basis

Reasoning

Agentic

Coding

Knowledge

Math

Multilingual

Multimodal

Instruction following

Shape of the matched evidence

What each workload costs

Chat turn

Repository review

Cache-heavy agent loop

Specification differences

Context window

API model ID

Cached-input rate

Documented inputs

Documented outputs

Provider availability

Reasoning profile

Weight access

License

Release date

Benchmark evidence

Agentic

Coding

Reasoning

Knowledge

Math

Multilingual

Instruction following

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Which is better for coding, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Which is better for agentic tasks, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Which costs less, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Which has the larger context window, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Related comparisons

Watch Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Qwen3.7 Max