Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
68
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
64
Verified leaderboard positions: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #5 · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B #13
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+4.6 difference
Coding
+5.1 difference
Knowledge
+21.1 difference
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
262K
262K
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 68 to 64. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.6 against 60.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SuperGPQA, 67.1% to 64.7%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 68 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SuperGPQA, where the scores are 67.1% and 64.7%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 60.5. Inside this category, SuperGPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 66.9. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 56.1 versus 51.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.