Model comparison
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Head-to-head evidence from 26 shared benchmark results across 7 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #47 (Supported); Qwen3.7 Plus #21 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.7 Plus share 26 comparable benchmark results. 7 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Qwen3.5-122B-A10B; 43 to Qwen3.7 Plus.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 26
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only
- 5
- Qwen3.7 Plus only
- 43
- Comparable categories
- 7 / 8
Pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 26 shared benchmark results across 7 evidence categories; 7 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Qwen3.7 Plus is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 67.22 to 60.56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.7 Plus's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 91.7 against 60.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 49.4% to 70.3%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Qwen3.7 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Δ | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B60.2 | Margin→ 31.5 | Qwen3.7 Plus91.7 |
| Knowledge | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B83.6 | Margin← 23.5 | Qwen3.7 Plus60.1 |
| Agentic | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B56.4 | Margin→ 15.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus71.7 |
| Inst. Following | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B93.4 | Margin← 8.9 | Qwen3.7 Plus84.5 |
| Multimodal | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B77.2 | Margin→ 4.3 | Qwen3.7 Plus81.5 |
| Coding | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B72.0 | Margin→ 3.6 | Qwen3.7 Plus75.6 |
| Multilingual | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B82.2 | Margin→ 3.2 | Qwen3.7 Plus85.4 |
| Math | Qwen3.5-122B-A10BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus92.9 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 49.4%B 70.3%Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 20.9Terminal-Bench 2.0: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scored 49.4%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 70.3%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
OSWorld-Verified
AgenticA 58%B 73.3%Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 15.3OSWorld-Verified: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scored 58%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 73.3%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
CharXiv
MultimodalA 77.2%B 85.9%Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 8.7CharXiv: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scored 77.2%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 85.9%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 72%B 77.7%Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 5.7SWE-bench Verified: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scored 72%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 77.7%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SuperGPQA
KnowledgeA 67.1%B 71.4%Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 4.3SuperGPQA: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scored 67.1%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 71.4%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0 input / $0 output | Qwen3.7 PlusNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Qwen3.5-122B-A10BNot available | Qwen3.7 PlusNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Qwen3.5-122B-A10BNot available | Qwen3.7 PlusNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B262K | Qwen3.7 Plus1M | Qwen3.7 Plus lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticQwen3.7 Plus wins17 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 49.4% | 70.3% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| BrowseCompSource | 63.8% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 58% | 73.3% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 93.6% | 93% | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 20.7% | 20.8% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 23.9% | 21.8% | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 978 | 936 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads |
| QwenClawBenchSource | — | 61.8% | Not comparable |
| QwenWebBenchSource | — | 1536 | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 62.7% | Not comparable |
| BFCL v4Source | — | 72.9% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 73.2% | Not comparable |
| VITA-BenchSource | — | 45.6% | Not comparable |
| DeepPlanningSource | — | 62.3% | Not comparable |
| AndroidWorldSource | — | 81.0% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 22.4% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | — | 2.8% | Not comparable |
CodingQwen3.7 Plus wins9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 72% | 77.7% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 45.7% | 55.9% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 42.0% | 45.5% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 70.3% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 57.6% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 75.8% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 41.1% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 51.3% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBenchSource | — | 89.6% | Not comparable |
ReasoningQwen3.7 Plus wins4 benchmarks
KnowledgeQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 86.7% | 88.5% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| SuperGPQASource | 67.1% | 71.4% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| GPQASource | 86.6% | 90.3% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 32.3% | 39.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 85.7% | 90.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-HLESource | 23.4% | 33.4% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -39.6% | 2.4% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 24.7% | 22.2% | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 85.5% | 25.5% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 90.3% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 34.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ReduxSource | — | 94.5% | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
MultilingualQwen3.7 Plus wins5 benchmarks
MultimodalQwen3.7 Plus wins20 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMUSource | 83.9% | — | Not comparable |
| MMVUSource | 74.7% | — | Not comparable |
| MathVisionSource | 86.2% | 90.3% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| CharXivSource | 77.2% | 85.9% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| V*Source | 93.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 75.0% | 80.5% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 79% | Not comparable |
| ERQASource | — | 69.8% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (MM)Source | — | 71.0% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 79.0% | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | — | 81.7% | Not comparable |
| MMSearch-PlusSource | — | 41.4% | Not comparable |
| RealWorldQASource | — | 86.9% | Not comparable |
| OmniDocBench 1.5Source | — | 91.4% | Not comparable |
| OCRBench V2Source | — | 70.7% | Not comparable |
| ODINW13Source | — | 51.1% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (with subtitle)Source | — | 88.0% | Not comparable |
| VideoMMMUSource | — | 85.4% | Not comparable |
| MLVU (M-Avg)Source | — | 87.4% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1288 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (8)
Which is better, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 67.22 to 60.56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 49.4% and 70.3%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.6 versus 60.1. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 75.6 versus 72. Inside this category, AA Coding Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for reasoning, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 91.7 versus 60.2. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.7 versus 56.4. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 77.2. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for instruction following, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.4 versus 84.5. Inside this category, AA-IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for multilingual tasks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 85.4 versus 82.2. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.