Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Qwen3.5-27B
65
Qwen3.6-27B
72
Verified leaderboard positions: Qwen3.5-27B #12 · Qwen3.6-27B #10
Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-27B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Agentic
+7.7 difference
Coding
+7.6 difference
Knowledge
+18.4 difference
Qwen3.5-27B
Qwen3.6-27B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
262K
262K
Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-27B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Qwen3.6-27B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.6-27B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 59.3 against 51.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41.6% to 59.3%. Qwen3.5-27B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Qwen3.6-27B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41.6% and 59.3%.
Qwen3.5-27B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.6 versus 62.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 63. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 59.3 versus 51.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.