Qwen3.5 397B vs SWE-1.7
Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
SWE-1.7 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Qwen3.5 397B
61
SWE-1.7
75
Verified leaderboard positions: Qwen3.5 397B #24 · SWE-1.7 unranked
Pick SWE-1.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B | Δ | SWE-1.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 56.5 | → 25.0 | 81.5 |
| Coding | 60.3 | — | — |
| Reasoning | 63.2 | — | — |
| Knowledge | 56.9 | — | — |
| Math | 90.6 | — | — |
| Multilingual | 84.7 | — | — |
| Multimodal | 79.6 | — | — |
| Inst. Following | 92.6 | — | — |
Operational Comparison
Qwen3.5 397B
SWE-1.7
$0.6 / $3.6
N/A
96 t/s
N/A
2.44s
N/A
128K
256K
Quick Verdict
Pick SWE-1.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
SWE-1.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 75 to 61. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
SWE-1.7's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 81.5 against 56.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 52.5% to 81.5%.
SWE-1.7 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Qwen3.5 397B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. SWE-1.7 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Qwen3.5 397B or SWE-1.7?
SWE-1.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 75 to 61. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 52.5% and 81.5%.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Qwen3.5 397B or SWE-1.7?
SWE-1.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 56.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.