Skip to main content

Model comparison

Qwen3.5 Plus vs Qwen3 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

47.2/100
Margin
1.0pts
winning →
Alibaba
48.16/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Qwen3.5 Plus #138 (Estimated); Qwen3 Max #128 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Qwen3.5 Plus and Qwen3 Max share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Qwen3.5 Plus; 13 to Qwen3 Max.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Qwen3.5 Plus only
3
Qwen3 Max only
13
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Qwen3.5 Plus and Qwen3 Max is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Qwen3.5 Plus and Qwen3 Max
CategoryQwen3.5 PlusΔQwen3 Max
MathQwen3.5 Plus16.3MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricQwen3.5 PlusQwen3 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensQwen3.5 Plus$0.4 input / $2.4 outputQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondQwen3.5 PlusNot availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenQwen3.5 PlusNot availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensQwen3.5 Plus1MQwen3 Max1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3 MaxResult
JobBenchSource 18.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 74.3%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 43.74%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3 MaxResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 15.74%3.51%Qwen3.5 Plus leads
AA-SciCodeSource 38.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3 MaxResult
AA-LCRSource 46.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3 MaxResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 24.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 76.4%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 11.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -43.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3 MaxResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 21.034%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3 MaxResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1148Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusQwen3 MaxResult
AA-IFBenchSource 44.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Qwen3.5 Plus and Qwen3 Max on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Qwen3.5 Plus and Qwen3 Max today?

Qwen3.5 Plus: $0.40 input / $2.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.