Skip to main content

Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Qwen3.6-27B

72

VS

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

70

4 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Qwen3.6-27B #10 · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B #15

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.6-27B
59.3vs51.5

+7.8 difference

Coding

Qwen3.6-27B
70.6vs66.9

+3.7 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.6-27B
62.2vs60.5

+1.7 difference

Multimodal

Qwen3.6-27B
75.8vs75.3

+0.5 difference

Operational Comparison

Qwen3.6-27B

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

262K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Qwen3.6-27B has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 72 versus 70. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Qwen3.6-27B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 59.3 against 51.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 59.3% to 51.5%.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Qwen3.6-27B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-27B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 70. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 59.3% and 51.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen3.6-27B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.2 versus 60.5. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.6-27B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 66.9. Inside this category, terminalBench2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Qwen3.6-27B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 59.3 versus 51.5. Inside this category, QwenWebBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Qwen3.6-27B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.8 versus 75.3. Inside this category, SimpleVQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Qwen3.6-27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.