Skip to main content

Model comparison

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) vs Soofi S 30B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Benchmark data for one or both models is coming soon. This page currently shows metadata and pricing where BenchLM has it, and score-level comparisons will populate as public benchmark results land.
Margin
24.0pts
← winning
Soofi Project
45/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 22 results are unique to Qwen 3.6 Max (preview); 8 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
0
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only
22
Soofi S 30B-A3B only
8
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)'s sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 73.9 against 49.9.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Soofi S 30B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Qwen 3.6 Max (preview).

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Soofi S 30B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Not availableSoofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Not availableSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Not availableSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensQwen 3.6 Max (preview)256KSoofi S 30B-A3B1MSoofi S 30B-A3B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.4%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource 59.0%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource 1532Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
SWE-bench ProSource 57.3%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 47%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 42.9%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.4%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 43.9%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 46.9%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 73.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA-LCRSource 69.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 3.7%Not comparable
BBHSource 78.8%Not comparable
DROPSource 66.5%Not comparable
KnowledgeQwen 3.6 Max (preview) wins
BenchmarkQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
SuperGPQASource 73.9%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 88.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 28.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 10.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 37.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 44.2%Not comparable
GPQASource 43.4%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 43.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 51.4%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 66.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 23.103%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 86.1%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 76.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 45.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.9 versus 49.9. Soofi S 30B-A3B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.