Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs Soofi S 30B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

83/100
Margin
38.0pts
← winning
Soofi S 30B-A3B
Soofi Project
45/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Qwen3.7 Max #2; Soofi S 30B-A3B unranked

Evidence parity. Qwen3.7 Max and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 3 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 54 results are unique to Qwen3.7 Max; 5 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
3
Qwen3.7 Max only
54
Soofi S 30B-A3B only
5
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen3.7 Max is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.7 Max's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 64.5 against 49.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 92.4% to 43.4%.

Qwen3.7 Max is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Qwen3.7 Max and Soofi S 30B-A3B
CategoryQwen3.7 MaxΔSoofi S 30B-A3B
KnowledgeQwen3.7 Max64.5Margin← 14.6Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9
AgenticQwen3.7 Max69.7MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
CodingQwen3.7 Max74.1MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
ReasoningQwen3.7 Max90.4MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
MathQwen3.7 Max97.1MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
MultilingualQwen3.7 Max87.0MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
Inst. FollowingQwen3.7 Max84.4MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Qwen3.7 MaxB · Soofi S 30B-A3B

  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 92.4%B 43.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 49
    GPQA: Qwen3.7 Max scored 92.4%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 43.4%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  2. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 89.6%B 51.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 38.2
    MMLU-Pro: Qwen3.7 Max scored 89.6%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 51.4%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricQwen3.7 MaxSoofi S 30B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensQwen3.7 MaxNot availableSoofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondQwen3.7 MaxNot availableSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenQwen3.7 MaxNot availableSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensQwen3.7 Max1MSoofi S 30B-A3B1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 69.7%—Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource 64.3%—Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource 1568—Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 65.2%—Not comparable
BFCL v4Source 75.0%—Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 76.4%—Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 47.9%—Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 53.5%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 30.6%—Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 94.7%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 38.7%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1273—Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 64.27%—Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 18.7%—Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 908—Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 25.6%—Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 45.0%—Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource 42.5%—Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 80.4%—Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 60.6%—Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 78.3%—Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 47.2%—Not comparable
SciCodeSource 53.5%—Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource 91.6%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 69.7%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 66.0%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 50.8%—Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 48.8%—Not comparable
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source 74.5%—Not comparable
HumanEvalSource —73.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
MRCRv2Source 90.4%—Not comparable
CritPtSource 13.4%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 69.0%—Not comparable
BBHSource —78.8%Not comparable
DROPSource —66.5%Not comparable
KnowledgeQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
GPQASource 92.4%43.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GPQA-DSource 92.4%43.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
HLESource 41.4%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 89.6%51.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
MMLU-ReduxSource 95%—Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 73.6%—Not comparable
MMMLUSource 90.3%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 46.0%—Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 92.3%—Not comparable
AA-HLESource 38.1%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 14.1%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 30.1%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 22.9%—Not comparable
AGIEvalSource —66.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source 97.1%—Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 90.0%—Not comparable
ApexSource 44.5%—Not comparable
GSM8KSource —86.1%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
MMLU-ProXSource 87%—Not comparable
NOVA-63Source 59.0%—Not comparable
INCLUDESource 86.2%—Not comparable
MAXIFESource 89.2%—Not comparable
PolyMathSource 86.5%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1296—Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
IFEvalSource 94.3%—Not comparable
IFBenchSource 79.1%—Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 80.5%—Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Qwen3.7 Max or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 92.4% and 43.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen3.7 Max or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 64.5 versus 49.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Alibaba Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.