Data as of November 11, 2026 · How the score is built
Released Nov 11, 20261M contextBaidu ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview launch post
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Decision readingERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 17 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.
Released Nov 11, 2026 — see all recent releases
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
Unranked
field median 51.2Not eligible for a public rank
Price
API rate not published
input median $0.60No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 92 tok/sTime to first token not measured
Context
1Mtokens
field median 256,000Maximum output length is tracked separately
Strongest published evidence
Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.
Validate before choosing
17 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Source-linked · 17 displayable benchmark rows
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank Not rankedWeight 22%10 benchmarksVerified | 79.2 | 10 benchmarks | Verified | |||
| CodingWeight 20%3 benchmarksVerified | Score pending | 3 benchmarks | Verified | |||
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| MultimodalWeight 12%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | 1 benchmark | Verified | |||
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkVerified | 68.1 | 1 benchmark | Verified | |||
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
17 of 892 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100
Coverage detailsHow much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic10/10 verified
- Coding3/3 verified
- ReasoningNot measured
- Multimodal1/1 verified
- Knowledge1/1 verified
- MultilingualNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
- MathNot measured
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding3 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | Score71.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Muse Wonder Full · 79.0% | Gap7.8 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| ProgramBenchProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch? | Score29.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 93.0% | Gap63.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| NL2Repo | Score64.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · 68.2% | Gap3.4 behind | WeightDisplay only |
Agentic10 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Score46.50% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 70.60% | Gap24.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| BrowseComp | Score87.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Atria Dawn Preview · 92.5% | Gap5.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| AutomationBench | Score61.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 62.2% | Gap0.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| MCP Atlas | Score84.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Muse Spark Open · 89.2% | Gap4.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Score75.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 80.6% | Gap5.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | Score21.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Mythos 5.2 · 75.3% | Gap54.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| APEX-Agents | Score64.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Hy4 · 75.2% | Gap11 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| DRACOData Research and Analysis with Complex Operations | Score84.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 88.6% | Gap3.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| SpreadsheetBench 2 | Score36.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 36.4% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | |
| Agents' Last Exam (CLI)Agents' Last Exam v1.1, CLI subset | Score29.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Kimi K3.1 Pro · 44.2% | Gap15.2 behind | WeightDisplay only |
Multimodal1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OfficeQA Pro v2 | Score67.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 67.9% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only |
Knowledge1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLE w/o toolsHumanity's Last Exam without tools | Score46.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Fable 5.2 · 73.2% | Gap26.8 behind | WeightDisplay only |
External signals2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cookie-BenchCookie-Bench: Continuous On-screen Key Interaction Evaluation for Web Generation | Score88.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5.5 · 91.5% | Gap3.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | |
| BlenderWorld (text-only)BlenderWorld: Benchmarking Visual Agents for 3D Creation from Real-World References (text-only subset) | Score79.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5.5 · 86.1% | Gap7.1 behind | WeightDisplay only |
Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value
All 17 rowsLineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Base entry
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- baidu/ernie-5.5-flash-preview:freeOpenRouter ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview (free) route
- Context window
- 1MOpenRouter ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview (free) route
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- textOpenRouter ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview (free) route
- Output modalities
- textOpenRouter ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview (free) route
- Parameters
- Not sourced yet
- Availability
- Baidu Qianfan API · OpenRouter (free, served by Baidu)Baidu: Introducing ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- activeBaidu: Introducing ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing recordBaidu Qianfan model page
- Self-host
- Weight availability is pending
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has no verified publication yet for weight access. Its 1M context window is documented separately from that pending weight status. The profile records its reasoning mode as reasoning.
Baidu serves ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview through the Qianfan platform API and as a free OpenRouter route (baidu/ernie-5.5-flash-preview:free, 1,024,000-token context, text in and text out, reasoning always on). OpenRouter also lists a paid baidu/ernie-5.5-flash-preview route with no provider yet. Baidu says the post-trained weights will be open-sourced under Apache 2.0 by November 25, 2026; until a checkpoint is public, source type stays pending. The pre-trained ERNIE-5.5-Flash-Base checkpoint is already on Hugging Face under Baidu's own base-model license.
17 of 892 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Last updated November 11, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Ask your AI, from current BenchLM data
Where does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview rank right now, and what does it cost?
Questions
How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview perform overall in AI benchmarks?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 17 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview good for knowledge and understanding?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview good for coding and programming?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has source-displayable benchmark coverage for multimodal and grounded tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview currently has 17 source-displayable rows. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has a documented context window of 1M. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.