Data as of November 11, 2026 · How the score is built
GPT-5.6 Cyber
Decision readingGPT-5.6 Cyber is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 3 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.
Released Aug 10, 2026 — see all recent releases
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
Unranked
field median 51.2Not eligible for a public rank
Price
API rate not published
input median $0.60No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 92 tok/sTime to first token not measured
Context
Not published
field median 256,000No exact-model context limit is sourced
Strongest published evidence
Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.
Validate before choosing
3 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Source-linked · 3 displayable benchmark rows
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | 1 benchmark | Verified | |||
| CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured | |||
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
3 of 894 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100
Coverage detailsHow much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic1/1 verified
- CodingNot measured
- ReasoningNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- KnowledgeNot measured
- MultilingualNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
- MathNot measured
Benchmark ledger
Every result says who ran the test. For this model, OpenAI ran all 3. Agentic opens by default. The tick marks the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference.
Agentic1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Who ran it | Use in ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ExploitGym | 32.1% | Best verified: Gemini 4 Carbon · 53.5% | Gap21.4 behind | Reported by OpenAI | Shown only |
External signals2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Who ran it | Use in ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACCR Daybreak RedAdvanced Cyber Completion Rate — Daybreak Red | 95.0% | Best verified: GPT-5.6 Cyber · 95.0% | GapHighest listed | Reported by OpenAI | Shown only |
| ExploitGym HoneypotExploitGym Honeypot out-of-scope exploitation rate | 5.51% | Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 0.00% | Gap5.5 behind | Reported by OpenAI | Shown only |
Outlined bars are lab-reported. Filled bars are benchmark-run or independent.
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- gpt-5.6-cyberOpenAI Daybreak overview
- Context window
- Not publishedOpenAI Daybreak expansion
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yetOpenAI Daybreak expansion
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yetOpenAI Daybreak expansion
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Daybreak RedOpenAI Daybreak expansion
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- limited accessOpenAI Daybreak expansion
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing recordOpenAI Daybreak overview
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track GPT-5.6 Cyber, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
GPT-5.6 Cyber is a proprietary model. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Available only through Daybreak Red trusted access under the gpt-daybreak-red alias. OpenAI identifies the API model as gpt-5.6-cyber.
Display-only trusted-access profile for GPT-5.6 Cyber, a separate model built on GPT-5.6 Sol. OpenAI reports a 95.0% Advanced Cyber Completion Rate for the Daybreak Red configuration. ACCR measures whether approved cyber tasks are completed rather than refused; it is an access-and-compliance measure, not a general capability score.
GPT-5.6 Cyber sits in the GPT-5.6 family with GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Terra, GPT-5.6 Luna. 3 of 894 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Last updated November 11, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Questions
How does GPT-5.6 Cyber perform overall in AI benchmarks?
GPT-5.6 Cyber has 3 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Is GPT-5.6 Cyber good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
GPT-5.6 Cyber has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Which sibling models are related to GPT-5.6 Cyber?
GPT-5.6 Cyber belongs to the GPT-5.6 family. Related tracked variants include GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Terra, GPT-5.6 Luna. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
Does GPT-5.6 Cyber have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. GPT-5.6 Cyber currently has 3 source-displayable rows. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of GPT-5.6 Cyber?
GPT-5.6 Cyber's provider has not published a context-window limit for this exact model. The profile leaves the value unavailable instead of borrowing a number from an earlier family member or a third-party route. Maximum output length is tracked separately when the provider documents it.