Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data
Live source snapshot

Audio Realism Benchmark

Blind listening comparisons measure how human text-to-speech output sounds across phone-agent, conversational, and explainer speech.

Source snapshots refreshed
Five measurement lanesVOICE / S2S

Reasoning, task completion, conversation dynamics, experience, and latency stay separate.

Back to directory

Benchmark profile

Scope
500 held-out American-English prompts; female and male voices; human recordings included in the comparison pool
Primary metric
Bradley–Terry Elo-style rating, win rate, and uncertainty
Owner
Design Arena
Available evidence
Machine-readable public leaderboard

What it measures

Voice experience
Is the exchange natural, robust, and responsive?

How the protocol works

  1. 01

    Vetted native speakers hear two clips generated from the same prompt and select the one that sounds more human.

  2. 02

    The benchmark uses 500 private, held-out prompts split across phone-agent, conversational, and explainer speech.

  3. 03

    One female and one male American-English voice are selected for each model, and comparisons use the same gender.

  4. 04

    Scores are fitted with a Bradley–Terry model and presented as an Elo-style rating; real human recordings remain in the comparison pool.

Available results

Protocol details
Audio-realism arena results: Elo-style rating, uncertainty, win rate, battles, and generation time per model.
RankModelElo-style ratingBT uncertaintyWin rateBattlesAvg. generation
1Freya TTS Adam V1
Freya
1442±23.879.3%3812.41s
2Kalpa TTS Beta v0.1
Kalpa Labs
1380±18.876.3%5862.91s
3Bland Speech v3
Bland AI
1379±18.477.8%6261.40s
4Cartesia Sonic 3.6
Cartesia
1341±27.473.6%2501.82s
5Deepgram Flux TTS
deepgram
1310±29.770.2%2087.21s
6ElevenLabs Eleven v3 Conversational
ElevenLabs
1238±17.764.6%5082.61s
7Murf Falcon 2
Murf AI
1232±27.663.3%2181.62s
8Cartesia Sonic 3.5
Cartesia
1218±13.963.1%8421.61s
9MAI-Voice-2
Microsoft
1208±15.861.1%6401.40s
10HeyGen Voice
heygen
1185±21.762.2%30414.96s
11Grok TTS
xAI
1179±15.258.3%6671.79s
12MAI-Voice-2-Flash
microsoft
1137±31.051.2%1661.65s
13MiniMax Speech 2.8 HD
MiniMax
1135±26.651.1%2177.08s
14MiniMax Speech-02 HD
MiniMax
1121±15.050.9%6742.95s
15Gemini 2.5 Pro TTS Preview
Google
1110±14.749.6%6885.96s
16GPT Realtime 2
OpenAI
1103±19.947.2%3622.46s
17Google Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS
google
1080±18.148.2%4235.01s
18GPT Realtime 2.1
OpenAI
1064±24.546.2%2363.21s
19Eleven v4
elevenlabs
1031±21.442.1%3042.53s
20GPT-4o mini TTS
OpenAI
1029±15.340.3%6501.99s
21Gemini 3.1 Flash TTS Preview
Google
1025±15.137.2%6834.20s
22Voxtral TTS 3
mistral
1019±21.441.3%3002.26s
23Eleven v4 Turbo
elevenlabs
998±20.738.3%3321.90s
24ElevenLabs Eleven v3
ElevenLabs
970±15.730.5%6732.83s
25Gemini 2.5 Flash TTS Preview
Google
970±15.432.5%6904.32s
26Fish Audio Drama 3
fish-audio
958±21.134.2%3302.01s
27Lightning v3.1 Pro
Smallest AI
955±15.831.0%6751.73s
28Fish Audio S2.1 Pro
Fish Audio
953±20.433.2%3732.77s
29Magpie TTS Multilingual
nvidia
875±17.524.3%58815.20s
30Inworld Realtime TTS-2
Inworld
860±28.624.7%2192.56s
31Qwen-Audio-3.0 TTS Flash
alibaba
854±33.323.0%1742.76s
32Inworld TTS-1.5 Max
Inworld
789±19.315.1%6674.11s

Interpretation limit

The leaderboard measures perceived human-likeness for the selected American-English voices and prompt mix. It does not measure factual accuracy, task completion, full-duplex interaction, or multilingual quality.