Spoken reasoning
Does the system understand and answer spoken requests?
Each benchmark covers a different slice of voice-system quality. The matrix makes those boundaries visible before you compare any scores.
Reasoning, task completion, conversation dynamics, experience, and latency stay separate.
| Benchmark | Spoken reasoning | Task completion | Conversation dynamics | Voice experience | Latency | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dessa launch recordings Block shares live recordings of people talking with Dessa, a full-duplex model trained only on human speech. Block publishes no benchmark scores; the model is waitlist-only and coming soon. | Provider results Launch page with 6 featured and 15 additional recordings, October 2026 | |||||
| Eleven Realtime provider evaluation ElevenLabs reports separate speech-reasoning, conversation, human-preference, task-success, and response-latency measurements for Eleven Realtime v1 Mini and Max. | Provider results Provider-published selected figures; no shared overall score | |||||
| Voxtral 3 launch evaluation Mistral reports 4.0% FLEURS word error rate and 18.4% diarization cpWER for Voxtral Small Transcribe 3, the lowest cpWER of the seven systems in its chart. | Provider results Exact values in the chart data of the October 20, 2026 launch post | |||||
| Ming-3.0 speech evaluation inclusionAI reports 0.800% Chinese and 1.584% English word error rate on the Seed-TTS testset for Ming-3.0-tts-0.5B, and 3.45 Chinese CER with 3.69 English WER for Ming-3.0-audio-flash. | Provider results Exact values in the Hugging Face model cards; the audio and ASR cards publish them as table images | |||||
| Liquid AI LFM3 audio and omni evaluation Liquid AI reports 6.23% English ASR word error rate, 3.83 UTMOSv2 English speech quality and 73.13 on VoiceBench for LFM3-Audio-2B, and 70.09 on Daily-Omni with 46.32 on OmniBench for LFM3-Omni-2B. | Provider results Exact values in the Hugging Face model cards and the launch post | |||||
| Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe launch evaluation NVIDIA reports 4.71% mean WER on the nine-set English Open ASR Leaderboard, 10.98% on the long-form board, 4.62% on the seven-language multilingual board and 15.80% mean cpWER on full-session multi-speaker recordings for Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe, plus 73.40% on MMAU and 66.67% on MMAR with reasoning on. | Provider results Exact values in the Hugging Face model card tables | |||||
| Jais-ASR Arabic speech evaluation IFM reports 22.85% word error rate and 8.37% character error rate, macro-averaged over six Arabic speech test sets. Lower error rates are better. | Provider results Exact provider tables in the model card and October 2026 launch blog | |||||
| HeyGen Voice evaluation HeyGen reports a 76.1/100 voice-clone rating from 43 people judging their own digital twins. A separate platform study gave full-clone 41.7% of 6,153 three-way preference votes. | Provider results Provider tables published October 14, 2026 | |||||
| Grok Voice 3.0 launch evaluation xAI reports 74% EVA-Bench accuracy for Grok Voice 3.0. The model launched in the Voice Agent API on October 14, 2026 at $0.08 per minute. | Provider results Exact accuracy stated in the October 14 launch post | |||||
| MAI-Voice-2.1 launch notes Microsoft lists two multilingual text-to-speech models at different latency and character-price points. | Provider results Specifications published October 1, 2026; no independent listening-test score is included | |||||
| MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming launch notes Microsoft launched streaming transcription in 60 languages at an introductory $0.54 per hour through the end of 2026. | Provider results Provider specifications published October 1, 2026; evaluator measurements are linked separately | |||||
| MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming on AA-WER Artificial Analysis reports 2.5% word error rate for final and first-partial transcripts from MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming. | Live snapshot Exact evaluator payload retained in private evidence; percentages rounded to one decimal and seconds to two decimals | |||||
| Phonon-2 launch evaluation Phonon-2 has a reported 5.21% mean word error rate across seven English test sets. Fermion's launch report compares eight speech models and measures throughput across hardware and Mac runtimes. | Provider results Exact tables in the launch report, retrieved September 30, 2026; its accuracy table is also on the official model card | |||||
| Gemini 3.8 TTS launch evaluation Google’s September 23 launch post reports Hume voice-design and quality placements for Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS and Flash-Lite TTS. | Provider results Google states the Flash TTS design and accent scores and the two quality-index placements in prose; it does not state Flash-Lite’s underlying quality score. | |||||
| Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 launch evaluation xAI’s September 18, 2026 launch post reports a rank on an independent streaming speech-to-text leaderboard, four internal word-error-rate sets drawn from production traffic, and one exact multilingual short-phrase pair against Grok Voice Transcribe 1.0. | Provider results The short-phrase pair and the pricing are stated in the post’s prose. The four internal charts and the multilingual comparison render client-side, so their per-category values are not published in a readable form. | |||||
| Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash omni evaluation Qwen’s September 18, 2026 launch post reports a 32-row audio and audio-visual table for Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash against Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Seed 2.0 Lite, and Muse Spark 1.2, plus a separate static-versus-agent comparison on three video sets. | Provider results Exact figures tabulated in the official launch post for all five compared systems | |||||
| Canto launch evaluation Wispr’s September 17, 2026 launch post reports word error rates for Canto against five competing transcription systems on two private dictation sets and three public English datasets. | Provider results Exact figures labelled on the charts in the official launch post; the two dictation sets are private to Wispr | |||||
| Gemini 3.8 Audio model evaluation Google’s September 15 model evaluation reports separate results for Gemini 3.8 Live and Gemini 3.8 Live Extended Thinking on spoken-agent task suites. | Provider results Exact bar-chart labels in Google’s model evaluation PDF, plus figures stated in the prose of the launch announcement; EVA-Bench scatterplot points are not tabulated | |||||
| GPT Audio 1.5 model documentation OpenAI’s model page documents the modalities, limits, and pricing of gpt-audio-1.5; it publishes no benchmark scores for the model. | Provider results Specifications only; OpenAI publishes no evaluation numbers for this model | |||||
| GPT Transcribe model documentation OpenAI’s model page documents endpoints, features, and per-minute pricing for gpt-transcribe; it publishes no word-error-rate table on the page. | Provider results Specifications only | |||||
| GPT Live Transcribe model documentation OpenAI’s model page documents the realtime-only endpoint, latency controls, and per-minute pricing for gpt-live-transcribe; it publishes no accuracy table on the page. | Provider results Specifications only | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Transcribe launch evaluation Google’s August 26, 2026 launch post reports word error rates on an independent transcription leaderboard and FLEURS for pre-recorded and streaming transcription, plus a latency gain over Chirp 3. | Provider results Exact figures published in the official launch post | |||||
| MAI-Transcribe-2 launch evaluation Microsoft AI’s September 3, 2026 launch post reports FLEURS word error rate across 60 languages, an independent leaderboard position, and relative speed against competing transcription models. | Provider results Exact figures published in the official launch post | |||||
| MAI-Transcribe-1.5 launch evaluation Microsoft’s June 2, 2026 Foundry post reports the FLEURS word error rate improvement for MAI-Transcribe-1.5 over MAI-Transcribe-1. | Provider results Exact figures published in the official Foundry post | |||||
| MAI-Voice-2-Flash launch notes Microsoft AI’s July 23, 2026 post positions MAI-Voice-2-Flash as a faster, cheaper sibling of MAI-Voice-2 without publishing benchmark scores. | Provider results Relative claims only | |||||
| Sonic 3.6 launch evaluation Cartesia’s August 27, 2026 launch post reports independent controlled-voice Elo ratings, blind preference win rates against Eleven v3, response latency, and locale coverage for Sonic 3.6. | Provider results Exact figures published in the official launch post | |||||
| Realtime TTS-2 launch evaluation Inworld’s launch post reports an independent speech-arena ranking, time-to-first-audio, and language coverage for Realtime TTS-2. | Provider results Rank and latency published in the official launch post and docs; no Elo value given | |||||
| Realtime TTS-2 Flash launch notes Inworld’s model documentation reports time-to-first-byte and coverage for the Flash variant of Realtime TTS-2. | Provider results Documented figures only | |||||
| SeedRealtime launch notes ByteDance Seed’s August 5, 2026 announcement describes an end-to-end audio-visual full-duplex model and reports a halving of conversational pacing issues versus cascaded pipelines. | Provider results Relative claim only | |||||
| Hy ASR 3.0 preview launch notes Tencent’s Hunyuan site describes Hy ASR 3.0 preview as a Hy3-based recogniser with context-aware correction and broad dialect coverage; launch coverage cites word error rates near 3%. | Provider results Tencent’s site is descriptive; the WER values come from launch coverage and are marked secondary | |||||
| Deepgram Flux launch evaluation Deepgram’s October 2, 2025 launch announcement reports end-of-turn detection latency and Nova-3-level accuracy for Flux. | Provider results Latency figure published; accuracy stated relative to Nova-3 without a WER value | |||||
| Flux Multilingual launch evaluation Deepgram’s April 29, 2026 press release reports end-of-turn latency and language coverage for Flux Multilingual. | Provider results Latency and coverage published; accuracy stated as monolingual-grade without a WER value | |||||
| Pocket TTS project notes Kyutai’s TTS page and repository document Pocket TTS’s size, CPU real-time factor, and first-audio latency. | Provider results Documented figures only; no listening-test result | |||||
| Zonos 2 model evaluation Zyphra’s ZONOS2 GGUF model card reports word error rate, speaker similarity, and UTMOS for the reference F16 build. | Provider results Exact figures published on the official GGUF model card | |||||
| Granite Speech 5.0 TurboCTC model notes IBM’s model card and Granite 4.2 blog document the model’s size, training data, and throughput; Open ASR leaderboard results are published as images. | Provider results Throughput published in text; WER charts are images | |||||
| Cohere Transcribe Arabic model notes Cohere’s catalog and Hugging Face repository document the Arabic transcription model’s lineage and availability; no evaluation table is published. | Provider results No evaluation numbers published | |||||
| VibeVoice-ASR-Streaming model notes Microsoft’s model card documents streaming speaker-attributed transcription, hotword support, and ten-language coverage; evaluation results are published as an image. | Provider results Evaluation table published only as an image | |||||
| Qwen3-ASR model evaluation Qwen’s model card reports word error rates for Qwen3-ASR 1.7B and 0.6B across AMI, Earnings22, GigaSpeech, LibriSpeech, SPGISpeech, and VoxPopuli. | Provider results Exact figures published on the official model card | |||||
| AuK model notes Tencent’s model card documents AuK’s task coverage across speech generation, editing, enhancement, and separation; its benchmark chart is published as an image. | Provider results Benchmark chart published only as an image | |||||
| GPT-Live-1 API launch evaluation OpenAI’s API launch post reports spoken task success, full-duplex interactivity, tool calling, response quality, and turn-taking latency for GPT-Live-1 against GPT-Realtime-2.1 and GPT-Realtime-2. | Provider results Exact figures embedded in the official launch post charts | |||||
| Muse Voice Transcribe launch evaluation Meta’s launch evaluation reports streaming transcription accuracy, speaker diarization, and real-time audio-perception capabilities for Muse Voice Transcribe. | Provider results Exact figures published in the official launch post | |||||
| Audio Realism Benchmark Blind listening comparisons measure how human text-to-speech output sounds across phone-agent, conversational, and explainer speech. | Live snapshot Machine-readable public leaderboard | |||||
| VoiceBench A spoken question-answering suite spanning open-ended, knowledge, reasoning, instruction-following, and safety tasks. | Live snapshot Machine-readable public leaderboard | |||||
| MMAU Measures expert-level understanding and reasoning across speech, environmental sound, and music. | Live snapshot Machine-readable benchmark-owner leaderboard | |||||
| MMAU-Pro Tests harder audio reasoning across speech, sound, music, spatial audio, multiple clips, voice chat, and instruction following. | Live snapshot Machine-readable benchmark-owner leaderboard | |||||
| AudioAgentBench Evaluates real-time voice agents on policy compliance, tool use, grounding, ambiguity, and state tracking. | Live snapshot Machine-readable public run records | |||||
| Full-Duplex-Bench v3 Tests full-duplex voice agents on multi-tool tasks with human speech, disfluencies, interruptions, and latency measurements. | Paper results Results transcribed from the official paper | |||||
| τ-Voice Extends τ-bench into spoken customer-service tasks to measure the capability gap between text and voice agents. | Live snapshot Machine-readable benchmark-owner submissions and reproducible evaluation code | |||||
| EVA-Bench Separates enterprise task accuracy from conversational experience across realistic service scenarios. | Live snapshot Machine-readable benchmark-owner leaderboard, code, and public dataset | |||||
| Voice Agent Latency Benchmark Measures the silence callers experience between finishing a turn and hearing a voice-agent platform begin its reply. | Live snapshot Machine-readable public API and reproducible raw-call artifacts | |||||
| VoiceAgentBench A multilingual voice-agent suite covering tools, workflows, multi-turn interaction, and safety. | Reference Paper and public dataset | |||||
| ADU-Bench Measures how voice systems handle ambiguous, disfluent, and underspecified spoken dialogue. | Reference Paper and benchmark resources |
Does the system understand and answer spoken requests?
Can it follow policy, use tools, and finish a workflow?
Can it handle turns, interruptions, ambiguity, and state?
Is the exchange natural, robust, and responsive?
How long do responses, tool calls, and full tasks take?