Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Vals RSI Index v1.1 (Vals RSI Index)

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

Tests autonomous AI research on compression, language-model training, judge-harness engineering, and post-training under fixed compute and time budgets.

Evaluation results published by Vals AI. Published leaderboard aggregates and evaluation settings only. Dataset contents are not included.

Reference-anchored RSI index on Vals RSI Index — October 15, 2026

We mirror the published reference-anchored rsi index view for Vals RSI Index. Claude Opus 5.5 leads the public snapshot at 37.31%, followed by Claude Fable 5.1 (36.09%) and Claude Opus 5 (33.02%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

25 modelsAgenticCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated October 15, 2026

Reference-anchored RSI index table (25 models)

Reference-anchored RSI index results for Vals RSI Index
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Claude Opus 5.5Anthropicmax reasoning
37.31%
Not reportedClosed
2Claude Fable 5.1Anthropicmax reasoning
36.09%
Not reportedClosed
3Claude Opus 5Anthropicmax reasoning
33.02%
Not reportedClosed
4Gemini 4 ArgonGooglehigh reasoning
30.55%
Not reportedClosed
5GPT-6 SolOpenAImax reasoning
28.11%
Not reportedClosed
6GPT-6 AstraOpenAImax reasoning
27.07%
Not reportedClosed
7GPT-6.1 SolOpenAImax reasoning
26.62%
Not reportedClosed
8Grok 4.6xAIxhigh reasoning
25.46%
Not reportedClosed
9Muse Wonder FullMetamax reasoning
24.43%
Not reportedClosed
10Claude Fable 5Anthropicmax reasoning
24.32%
Not reportedClosed
11Claude Opus 4.8Anthropicmax reasoning
23.98%
Not reportedClosed
12GPT-5.6 SolOpenAImax reasoning
23.88%
Not reportedClosed
13GLM-5.3Z.AImax reasoning
22.91%
Not reportedOpen
14Qwen3.8 MaxAlibabamax reasoning
21.76%
Not reportedOpen
15Kimi K3Moonshot AImax reasoning
20.88%
Not reportedPending
16Grok 4.7xAIxhigh reasoning
20.20%
Not reportedClosed
17Gemini 3.8 FlashGooglehigh reasoning
19.93%
Not reportedClosed
18Muse Spark 1.3 MaxMetamax reasoning
19.64%
Not reportedUnknown
19Claude Opus 4.7Anthropicmax reasoning
19.08%
Not reportedClosed
20Gemini 3.7 FlashGooglehigh reasoning
18.27%
Not reportedClosed
21GPT-5.5OpenAIxhigh reasoning
16.48%
Not reportedClosed
22GPT-5.2OpenAIxhigh reasoning
15.80%
Not reportedClosed
23GPT-5.4OpenAIxhigh reasoning
15.48%
Not reportedClosed
24Claude Opus 4.5Anthropichigh reasoning
14.82%
Not reportedClosed
25Kimi K2.5 ThinkingMoonshot AImax reasoning
6.85%
Not reportedUnknown

How to read this leaderboard

Operator receipt: 25 sourced rows are currently displayable on this page; the leading published row is Claude Opus 5.5 at 37.31%.

Honest limit: The task references mix published results, human agreement, and a frontier model. Compute budgets and grading protocols differ across tasks, and the composite has no published confidence interval. It does not establish recursive self-improvement.

How Vals RSI Index is shown here

We mirror the Vals RSI Index v1.1 table, updated September 29, 2026, with its published overall index and four task scores. The tasks cover compression, language-model training, judge-harness engineering, and post-training. Each result combines a model with its provider-specific agent harness at the highest supported reasoning effort.

The index averages four reference-anchored log scores and expresses the result as a percentage. Zero marks each task's baseline, 50% marks a selected published, human, or frontier-model reference, and 100% marks the theoretical best. This is an index scale rather than a task success rate. The source does not publish confidence intervals for the composite.

Snapshot

25 Vals rows4 research tasksReference-anchored indexPrivate task setDisplay only

The published Vals RSI Index snapshot places Claude Opus 5.5 first at 37.31%. The third row is 4.29 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 12.99 points, so the table still separates the published systems.

25 models have been evaluated on Vals RSI Index. The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. Vals RSI Index is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About Vals RSI Index

Year

2026

Tasks

4 autonomous research tasks

Format

Mean reference-anchored log score, expressed as a percentage

Difficulty

AI research under fixed compute and time budgets

The published composite averages four reference-anchored log scores. On the percentage scale, 0% marks a task baseline, 50% matches a selected published, human, or frontier-model reference, and 100% marks the theoretical best. These are index points rather than task success rates. Models use provider-specific agent harnesses at their highest supported reasoning effort. We keep every published row display only and outside overall and category rankings.

Freshness and provenance

Version

Vals RSI Index 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does Vals RSI Index measure?

Tests autonomous AI research on compression, language-model training, judge-harness engineering, and post-training under fixed compute and time budgets.

Which model leads the published Vals RSI Index snapshot?

Claude Opus 5.5 currently leads the published Vals RSI Index snapshot with 37.31% reference-anchored rsi index. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on Vals RSI Index?

The October 15, 2026 snapshot contains 25 AI models.

Last updated: October 15, 2026 · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.