Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Anthropic
41.13/100
Margin
15.4pts
winning →
56.58/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); Claude Haiku 4.5 #77 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and Claude Haiku 4.5 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude 3 Opus; 5 to Claude Haiku 4.5.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude 3 Opus only
5
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and Claude Haiku 4.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens for Claude Haiku 4.5.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusClaude Haiku 4.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputClaude Haiku 4.5$1 input / $5 outputClaude Haiku 4.5 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableClaude Haiku 4.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableClaude Haiku 4.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KClaude Haiku 4.5200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusClaude Haiku 4.5Result
JobBenchSource 16.0%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusClaude Haiku 4.5Result
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusClaude Haiku 4.5Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusClaude Haiku 4.5Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 5.903%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusClaude Haiku 4.5Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1152Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and Claude Haiku 4.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and Claude Haiku 4.5 today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.