Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 5 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Anthropic
41.13/100
Margin
16.1pts
winning →
57.25/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); Gemini 2.5 Pro #70 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Pro share 5 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Claude 3 Opus; 19 to Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
5
Claude 3 Opus only
0
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
19
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 5 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 3 Opus.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Pro
CategoryClaude 3 OpusΔGemini 2.5 Pro
CodingClaude 3 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapGemini 2.5 Pro63.8
KnowledgeClaude 3 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapGemini 2.5 Pro27.4
MathClaude 3 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapGemini 2.5 Pro11.6

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.5 ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputGemini 2.5 Pro$1.25 input / $10 outputGemini 2.5 Pro has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableGemini 2.5 Pro117 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableGemini 2.5 Pro21.19 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KGemini 2.5 Pro1MGemini 2.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.5 ProResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 7.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 54.1%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 42.01%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 8.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 665Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.5 ProResult
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%33.3%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%42.8%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 63.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.40%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.5 ProResult
AA-LCRSource 66.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 2.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.5 ProResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%25.8%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%84.4%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 3.1%21.1%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
GPQASource 83%Not comparable
HLESource 18.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -14.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 87.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.5 ProResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 14.138%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.5 ProResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1197Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.5 ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource 48.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Pro today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Gemini 2.5 Pro: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.