Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Anthropic
41.13/100
Margin
10.1pts
winning →
51.25/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); Grok 4.1 Fast #107 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and Grok 4.1 Fast share 4 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude 3 Opus; 9 to Grok 4.1 Fast.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
4
Claude 3 Opus only
1
Grok 4.1 Fast only
9
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and Grok 4.1 Fast is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok 4.1 Fast. Grok 4.1 Fast has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 3 Opus.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusGrok 4.1 FastComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputGrok 4.1 Fast$0.2 input / $0.5 outputGrok 4.1 Fast has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableGrok 4.1 Fast138 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableGrok 4.1 Fast0.54 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KGrok 4.1 Fast1MGrok 4.1 Fast lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok 4.1 FastResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 63.7%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 47.32%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok 4.1 FastResult
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%29.6%Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok 4.1 FastResult
AA-LCRSource 22.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok 4.1 FastResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%16.9%Grok 4.1 Fast leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%63.7%Grok 4.1 Fast leads
AA-HLESource 3.1%5.0%Grok 4.1 Fast leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -50.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok 4.1 FastResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 48.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok 4.1 FastResult
AA-IFBenchSource 36.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and Grok 4.1 Fast on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and Grok 4.1 Fast today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Grok 4.1 Fast: $0.20 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.