Model comparison
Claude 4.1 Opus vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus #142 (Supported); Gemini 2.5 Flash #130 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Flash share 2 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus; 13 to Gemini 2.5 Flash.
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 2
- Claude 4.1 Opus only
- 2
- Gemini 2.5 Flash only
- 13
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Claude 4.1 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 2.5 Flash. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Claude 4.1 Opus | Δ | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Claude 4.1 Opus74.5 | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 2.5 FlashNot measured |
| Math | Claude 4.1 OpusNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 2.5 Flash4.7 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude 4.1 Opus | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus$15 input / $75 output | Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.3 input / $2.5 output | Gemini 2.5 Flash has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude 4.1 Opus29 tok/s | Gemini 2.5 Flash221 tok/s | Gemini 2.5 Flash has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude 4.1 Opus1.66 s | Gemini 2.5 Flash0.50 s | Gemini 2.5 Flash reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus200K | Gemini 2.5 Flash1M | Gemini 2.5 Flash lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic2 benchmarks
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 28.2% | 14.1% | Claude 4.1 Opus leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 68.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 5.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -42.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 26.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 93.3% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 39.0% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Flash on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Flash today?
Claude 4.1 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Gemini 2.5 Flash: $0.30 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.