Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude 4.1 Opus
53
Gemini 2.5 Pro
66
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 4.1 Opus only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Coding
+10.7 difference
Claude 4.1 Opus
Gemini 2.5 Pro
$null / $null
$1.25 / $5
29 t/s
117 t/s
1.66s
21.19s
200K
1M
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 4.1 Opus only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 66 to 53. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 2.5 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 66 to 53. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 74.5% and 63.8%.
Claude 4.1 Opus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.5 versus 63.8. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.