Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude 4.1 Opus
53
Grok Code Fast 1
42
Pick Claude 4.1 Opus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok Code Fast 1 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
Coding
+3.7 difference
Claude 4.1 Opus
Grok Code Fast 1
$null / $null
$null / $null
29 t/s
172 t/s
1.66s
2.81s
200K
256K
Pick Claude 4.1 Opus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok Code Fast 1 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
Claude 4.1 Opus is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 53 to 42. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude 4.1 Opus's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 74.5 against 70.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 74.5% to 70.8%.
Grok Code Fast 1 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus.
Claude 4.1 Opus is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 53 to 42. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 74.5% and 70.8%.
Claude 4.1 Opus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.5 versus 70.8. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.