Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking vs Gemini 1.5 Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
No comparison
35.71/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); Gemini 1.5 Pro #185 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Gemini 1.5 Pro share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking; 6 to Gemini 1.5 Pro.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking only
2
Gemini 1.5 Pro only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Gemini 1.5 Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 1.5 Pro has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 200K for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGemini 1.5 ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGemini 1.5 Pro$1.25 input / $5 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGemini 1.5 ProNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGemini 1.5 ProNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking200KGemini 1.5 Pro2MGemini 1.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Coding
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGemini 1.5 ProResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 22.62%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 23.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 29.5%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGemini 1.5 ProResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 10.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 58.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGemini 1.5 ProResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1219Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 55.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Gemini 1.5 Pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Gemini 1.5 Pro today?

Gemini 1.5 Pro: $1.25 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.