Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Composer 2
~62
Winner · 1/8 categoriesGLM-5V-Turbo
~58
0/8 categoriesComposer 2· GLM-5V-Turbo
Pick Composer 2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5V-Turbo only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Composer 2 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 62 to 58. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Composer 2's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 61.7 against 58.
GLM-5V-Turbo is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.20 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.50 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens for Composer 2. Composer 2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while GLM-5V-Turbo is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Composer 2 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| AgenticComposer 2 wins | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 61.7% | — |
| BrowseComp | — | 51.9% |
| OSWorld-Verified | — | 62.3% |
| BrowseComp-VL | — | 51.9% |
| OSWorld | — | 62.3% |
| AndroidWorld | — | 75.7% |
| WebVoyager | — | 88.5% |
| Coding | ||
| SWE Multilingual | 73.7% | — |
| React Native Evals | 96.2% | — |
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| Design2Code | — | 94.8% |
| Flame-VLM-Code | — | 93.8% |
| Vision2Web | — | 31.0% |
| ImageMining | — | 30.7% |
| MMSearch | — | 72.9% |
| MMSearch-Plus | — | 30.0% |
| SimpleVQA | — | 78.2% |
| Facts-VLM | — | 58.6% |
| V* | — | 89.0% |
| Reasoning | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Knowledge | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Instruction Following | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Multilingual | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Mathematics | ||
| Coming soon | ||
Composer 2 is ahead overall, 62 to 58.
Composer 2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.7 versus 58. GLM-5V-Turbo stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.