Exaone 4.0 32B vs GPT-4.1 mini

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 62.3.

Exaone 4.0 32B is the reasoning model in the pair, while GPT-4.1 mini is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-4.1 mini gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.

Quick Verdict

Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 mini only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
Terminal-Bench 2.0
54%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
71%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
49%

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
23.6%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
30%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
66%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
74%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
LongBench v2
80%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
82%

Knowledge

Exaone 4.0 32B

Exaone 4.0 32B

81.8

GPT-4.1 mini

62.3

81.8%
MMLU-Pro
Coming soon
Coming soon
MMLU
87.5%
Coming soon
GPQA
64.2%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
61%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
88.5%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
72%

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

85.3%
AIME 2025
Coming soon
Coming soon
AIME 2024
23.1%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Exaone 4.0 32B or GPT-4.1 mini?

Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 60.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Exaone 4.0 32B or GPT-4.1 mini?

Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 62.3. GPT-4.1 mini stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.