Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
65
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
65
Verified leaderboard positions: Exaone 4.0 32B unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #8
Treat this as a split decision. Exaone 4.0 32B makes more sense if knowledge is the priority; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is the better fit if you need the larger 262K context window.
Knowledge
+0.2 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
N/A
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
262K
Treat this as a split decision. Exaone 4.0 32B makes more sense if knowledge is the priority; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is the better fit if you need the larger 262K context window.
Exaone 4.0 32B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B finish on the same provisional overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The provisional headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Exaone 4.0 32B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are tied on the provisional overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 81.6. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.