Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs GPT-4.1 nano

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

34.95/100
Margin
6.2pts
winning →
41.14/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 1.5 Pro #194 (Supported); GPT-4.1 nano #170 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-4.1 nano share 6 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Gemini 1.5 Pro; 15 to GPT-4.1 nano.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
6
Gemini 1.5 Pro only
0
GPT-4.1 nano only
15
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-4.1 nano is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 1.5 Pro is priced at $1.25 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4.1 nano. Gemini 1.5 Pro has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1M for GPT-4.1 nano.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-4.1 nano
CategoryGemini 1.5 ProΔGPT-4.1 nano
KnowledgeGemini 1.5 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano50.3
MathGemini 1.5 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano1.0
Inst. FollowingGemini 1.5 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 nano83.2

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 1.5 ProGPT-4.1 nanoComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 1.5 Pro$1.25 input / $5 outputGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputGPT-4.1 nano has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 1.5 ProNot availableGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 1.5 ProNot availableGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 1.5 Pro2MGPT-4.1 nano1MGemini 1.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 ProGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 63Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 ProGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA Coding IndexSource 23.6%11.1%Gemini 1.5 Pro leads
AA-SciCodeSource 29.5%25.9%Gemini 1.5 Pro leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 ProGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA-LCRSource 17.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 ProGPT-4.1 nanoResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 10.0%9.6%Gemini 1.5 Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 58.9%51.2%Gemini 1.5 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 4.9%3.9%Gemini 1.5 Pro leads
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 ProGPT-4.1 nanoResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 ProGPT-4.1 nanoResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 55.0%40.1%Gemini 1.5 Pro leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1003Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 ProGPT-4.1 nanoResult
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-4.1 nano on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-4.1 nano today?

Gemini 1.5 Pro: $1.25 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-4.1 nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026