Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Gemini 1.5 Pro is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 55 to 43. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 1.5 Pro gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 128K for GPT-4o mini.
Pick Gemini 1.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4o mini only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Gemini 1.5 Pro
51.3
GPT-4o mini
82
Gemini 1.5 Pro
27.7
GPT-4o mini
87.2
Gemini 1.5 Pro
76
GPT-4o mini
87
Gemini 1.5 Pro is ahead overall, 55 to 43. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 56 and 87.2.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 82 versus 51.3. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 87.2 versus 27.7. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 76. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.