Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 5 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Gemini 1.5 Pro unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24
BenchAlign evidence: Gemini 1.5 Pro supported; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemini 1.5 Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 5 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Gemini 1.5 Pro; 34 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 5
- Gemini 1.5 Pro only
- 1
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 34
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemini 1.5 Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 5 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Gemini 1.5 Pro is priced at $1.25 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Ultra. Gemini 1.5 Pro has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1M for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Gemini 1.5 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Coding | Gemini 1.5 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Reasoning | Gemini 1.5 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Knowledge | Gemini 1.5 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra54.2 |
| Multilingual | Gemini 1.5 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
| Inst. Following | Gemini 1.5 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemini 1.5 Pro$1.25 input / $5 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemini 1.5 ProNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemini 1.5 ProNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemini 1.5 Pro2M | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Gemini 1.5 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 33.2% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 27.4% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1164 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 3.3% | Not comparable |
Coding8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding IndexSource | 23.6% | 49.3% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 29.5% | 39.9% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 71.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | — | 36.4% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 10.0% | 37.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 58.9% | 86.7% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-HLESource | 4.9% | 26.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| GPQASource | — | 87% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 21.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -0.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 28.5% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 83% | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemini 1.5 Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemini 1.5 Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra today?
Gemini 1.5 Pro: $1.25 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Ultra: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.