Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.25/100
Margin
2.8pts
← winning
54.48/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 2.5 Pro #70 (Supported); GPT-5.1-Codex-Max #90 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max share 13 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Gemini 2.5 Pro; 0 to GPT-5.1-Codex-Max.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
13
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
11
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
CategoryGemini 2.5 ProΔGPT-5.1-Codex-Max
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro63.8MarginNo overlapGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot measured
KnowledgeGemini 2.5 Pro27.4MarginNo overlapGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot measured
MathGemini 2.5 Pro11.6MarginNo overlapGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 2.5 Pro$1.25 input / $10 outputGPT-5.1-Codex-Max$1.25 input / $10 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 2.5 Pro117 tok/sGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 2.5 Pro21.19 sGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 2.5 Pro1MGPT-5.1-Codex-Max400KGemini 2.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 7.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 54.1%83%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Gert LabsSource 42.01%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 8.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 665Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 63.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.40%22.17%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA Coding IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 42.8%40.2%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
AA-LCRSource 66.0%67.3%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
CritPtSource 2.6%5.7%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
GPQASource 83%Not comparable
HLESource 18.8%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.8%34.7%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.4%86.0%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-HLESource 21.1%23.4%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -14.3%-6.0%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.0%39.2%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 87.4%74.4%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Math
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 14.138%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.9%72.5%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1199Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
AA-IFBenchSource 48.7%70.0%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max today?

Gemini 2.5 Pro: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.