Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Mistral Large 3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.25/100
Margin
6.9pts
← winning
50.4/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 2.5 Pro #70 (Supported); Mistral Large 3 #113 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Large 3 share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to Gemini 2.5 Pro; 0 to Mistral Large 3.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
16
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
8
Mistral Large 3 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Large 3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is priced at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens for Mistral Large 3. Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Large 3
CategoryGemini 2.5 ProΔMistral Large 3
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro63.8MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured
KnowledgeGemini 2.5 Pro27.4MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured
MathGemini 2.5 Pro11.6MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 2.5 Pro$1.25 input / $10 outputMistral Large 3$0.5 input / $1.5 outputMistral Large 3 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 2.5 Pro117 tok/sMistral Large 348 tok/sGemini 2.5 Pro has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 2.5 Pro21.19 sMistral Large 31.04 sMistral Large 3 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 2.5 Pro1MMistral Large 3128KGemini 2.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 3Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 7.1%5.5%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 54.1%24.6%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gert LabsSource 42.01%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 8.3%6.6%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
GDPval-AASource 665633Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 3Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 63.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.40%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 33.3%20.1%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-SciCodeSource 42.8%36.2%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 3Result
AA-LCRSource 66.0%34.7%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
CritPtSource 2.6%0.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 3Result
GPQASource 83%Not comparable
HLESource 18.8%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.8%15.9%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.4%68.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 21.1%4.1%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -14.3%-39.4%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.0%24.1%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 87.4%83.7%Mistral Large 3 leads
Math
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 3Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 14.138%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 3Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.9%55.7%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1199Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 48.7%36.2%Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Large 3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Large 3 today?

Gemini 2.5 Pro: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 3: $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemini 2.5 Pro
API / mo$8,438
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Large 3
API / mo$1,500
Self-host / mo$9,110
Break-even380M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.