Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Grok 4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 7 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

67.73/100
Margin
7.3pts
← winning
60.42/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro #19 (Supported); Grok 4 #50 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro and Grok 4 share 15 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Gemini 3 Pro; 1 to Grok 4.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
15
Gemini 3 Pro only
12
Grok 4 only
1
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Gemini 3 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 7 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Gemini 3 Pro is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 67.73 to 60.42. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 3 Pro's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 32.9 against 15.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), 37.600% to 19.655%.

Gemini 3 Pro gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 128K for Grok 4.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3 Pro and Grok 4
CategoryGemini 3 ProΔGrok 4
MathGemini 3 Pro32.9Margin← 17.6Grok 415.3
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro31.1MarginNo overlapGrok 4Not measured
MultimodalGemini 3 Pro81.1MarginNo overlapGrok 4Not measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemini 3 ProB · Grok 4

  1. FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 37.600%B 19.655%
    Winner: Gemini 3 ProΔ 17.9
    FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): Gemini 3 Pro scored 37.600%; Grok 4 scored 19.655%. Gemini 3 Pro wins this benchmark.

  2. FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 18.750%B 2.083%
    Winner: Gemini 3 ProΔ 16.7
    FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4): Gemini 3 Pro scored 18.750%; Grok 4 scored 2.083%. Gemini 3 Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3 ProGrok 4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3 Pro$2 input / $12 outputGrok 4Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3 Pro109 tok/sGrok 454 tok/sGemini 3 Pro has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3 Pro32.65 sGrok 415.60 sGrok 4 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3 Pro2MGrok 4128KGemini 3 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGrok 4Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 87.1%74.9%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gert LabsSource 63.23%42.34%Gemini 3 Pro leads
JobBenchSource 11.4%—Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGrok 4Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.30%—Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 56.1%45.7%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 91.7%—Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource —72.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGrok 4Result
ARC-AGI-2Source 31.1%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 70.7%68.0%Gemini 3 Pro leads
CritPtSource 9.1%2.0%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGrok 4Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 39.5%33.3%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.8%87.7%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 37.2%23.9%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 15.8%3.8%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 55.9%41.4%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.9%64.2%Grok 4 leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.8%—Not comparable
MathGemini 3 Pro wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGrok 4Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 37.600%19.655%Gemini 3 Pro leads
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.750%2.083%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGrok 4Result
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 92.2%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGrok 4Result
MMMU-ProSource 81%—Not comparable
MathVisionSource 86.6%—Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource 87.6%—Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 72.7%—Not comparable
CharXivSource 81.4%—Not comparable
V*Source 88.0%—Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.2%68.8%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGrok 4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 70.4%53.7%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Grok 4?

Gemini 3 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 67.73 to 60.42. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), where the scores are 37.600% and 19.655%.

Which is better for math, Gemini 3 Pro or Grok 4?

Gemini 3 Pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 32.9 versus 15.3. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Google Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.