Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Mistral Large 3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

67.73/100
Margin
17.3pts
← winning
50.4/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro #19 (Supported); Mistral Large 3 #113 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro and Mistral Large 3 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to Gemini 3 Pro; 4 to Mistral Large 3.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
12
Gemini 3 Pro only
15
Mistral Large 3 only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 3 Pro and Mistral Large 3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemini 3 Pro is priced at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens for Mistral Large 3. Gemini 3 Pro has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3 Pro and Mistral Large 3
CategoryGemini 3 ProΔMistral Large 3
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro31.1MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured
MathGemini 3 Pro32.9MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured
MultimodalGemini 3 Pro81.1MarginNo overlapMistral Large 3Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3 ProMistral Large 3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3 Pro$2 input / $12 outputMistral Large 3$0.5 input / $1.5 outputMistral Large 3 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3 Pro109 tok/sMistral Large 348 tok/sGemini 3 Pro has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3 Pro32.65 sMistral Large 31.04 sMistral Large 3 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3 Pro2MMistral Large 3128KGemini 3 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMistral Large 3Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 87.1%24.6%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gert LabsSource 63.23%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 11.4%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 5.5%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 6.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 633Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMistral Large 3Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.30%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 56.1%36.2%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 91.7%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 20.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMistral Large 3Result
ARC-AGI-2Source 31.1%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 70.7%34.7%Gemini 3 Pro leads
CritPtSource 9.1%0.0%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMistral Large 3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 39.5%15.9%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.8%68.0%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 37.2%4.1%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 15.8%-39.4%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 55.9%24.1%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.9%83.7%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.8%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMistral Large 3Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 37.600%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.750%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMistral Large 3Result
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 92.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMistral Large 3Result
MMMU-ProSource 81%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 86.6%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource 87.6%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 72.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81.4%Not comparable
V*Source 88.0%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.2%55.7%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMistral Large 3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 70.4%36.2%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 3 Pro and Mistral Large 3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 3 Pro and Mistral Large 3 today?

Gemini 3 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 3: $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemini 3 Pro
API / mo$10,500
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Large 3
API / mo$1,500
Self-host / mo$9,110
Break-even380M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.