Skip to main content

GLM-5.1 vs GPT-5.5

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.1

84

VS

GPT-5.5

89

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.1 unranked · GPT-5.5 #2

Pick GPT-5.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5.1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GPT-5.5
65.3vs81.8

+16.5 difference

Coding

GLM-5.1
60.9vs58.6

+2.3 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.5
52.3vs66.4

+14.1 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.1

GPT-5.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$5 / $30

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

203K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5.1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 89 to 84. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 81.8 against 65.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 63.5% to 82.7%. GLM-5.1 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens for GLM-5.1. That is roughly 6.8x on output cost alone. GPT-5.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 203K for GLM-5.1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5.1 or GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 89 to 84. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 63.5% and 82.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.1 or GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.4 versus 52.3. Inside this category, GPQA-D is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.1 or GPT-5.5?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60.9 versus 58.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.1 or GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 65.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
GPT-5.5
API / mo$26,250
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 23, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.