Skip to main content

GLM-5.1 vs MiniCPM5-1B

Data verified

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Verdict

GLM-5.1 leads for most workloads.

Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.

GLM-5.1

68

VS

MiniCPM5-1B

36

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.1 #16 · MiniCPM5-1B unranked

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniCPM5-1B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

BenchmarkGLM-5.1ΔMiniCPM5-1B
Math62.0 28.933.1
Knowledge52.3 8.244.1
Agentic65.4
Coding60.2
Inst. Following58.5

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.1

MiniCPM5-1B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

203K

131K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniCPM5-1B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

GLM-5.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 68 to 36. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.1's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 62 against 33.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HMMT Feb 2026, 82.6% to 25.8%.

GLM-5.1 gives you the larger context window at 203K, compared with 131K for MiniCPM5-1B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GLM-5.1 or MiniCPM5-1B?

GLM-5.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 68 to 36. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HMMT Feb 2026, where the scores are 82.6% and 25.8%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.1 or MiniCPM5-1B?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52.3 versus 44.1. Inside this category, GPQA-D is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GLM-5.1 or MiniCPM5-1B?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 62 versus 33.1. Inside this category, HMMT Feb 2026 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
MiniCPM5-1B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 9, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.