Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
GLM-5V-Turbo
~58
Winner · 1/8 categorieso1-pro
45
0/8 categoriesGLM-5V-Turbo· o1-pro
Pick GLM-5V-Turbo if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
GLM-5V-Turbo is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 58 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-5V-Turbo's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 58 against 39.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 62.3% to 32%.
o1-pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $150.00 input / $600.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.20 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-5V-Turbo. That is roughly 150.0x on output cost alone. o1-pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while GLM-5V-Turbo is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| AgenticGLM-5V-Turbo wins | ||
| BrowseComp | 51.9% | 50% |
| OSWorld-Verified | 62.3% | 32% |
| BrowseComp-VL | 51.9% | — |
| OSWorld | 62.3% | — |
| AndroidWorld | 75.7% | — |
| WebVoyager | 88.5% | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | — | 40% |
| Coding | ||
| SWE-bench Pro | — | 23% |
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| Design2Code | 94.8% | — |
| Flame-VLM-Code | 93.8% | — |
| Vision2Web | 31.0% | — |
| ImageMining | 30.7% | — |
| MMSearch | 72.9% | — |
| MMSearch-Plus | 30.0% | — |
| SimpleVQA | 78.2% | — |
| Facts-VLM | 58.6% | — |
| V* | 89.0% | — |
| MMMU-Pro | — | 48% |
| OfficeQA Pro | — | 49% |
| Reasoning | ||
| LongBench v2 | — | 54% |
| MRCRv2 | — | 59% |
| Knowledge | ||
| GPQA | — | 79% |
| FrontierScience | — | 63% |
| Instruction Following | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Multilingual | ||
| MMLU-ProX | — | 52% |
| Mathematics | ||
| AIME 2024 | — | 86% |
GLM-5V-Turbo is ahead overall, 58 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 62.3% and 32%.
GLM-5V-Turbo has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 58 versus 39.7. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.