Skip to main content

GPT-4.1 mini vs MAI-Thinking-1

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-4.1 mini

45

VS

MAI-Thinking-1

65

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 mini unranked · MAI-Thinking-1 #23

Pick MAI-Thinking-1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 mini only becomes the better choice if instruction following is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

MAI-Thinking-1
23.6vs71

+47.4 difference

Knowledge

MAI-Thinking-1
64.2vs69.9

+5.7 difference

Inst. Following

GPT-4.1 mini
88.5vs85

+3.5 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-4.1 mini

MAI-Thinking-1

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.4 / $1.6

N/A

Speed

80 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

0.76s

N/A

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick MAI-Thinking-1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 mini only becomes the better choice if instruction following is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

MAI-Thinking-1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 65 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MAI-Thinking-1's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 71 against 23.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 23.6% to 73.5%. GPT-4.1 mini does hit back in instruction following, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MAI-Thinking-1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while GPT-4.1 mini is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-4.1 mini gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-4.1 mini or MAI-Thinking-1?

MAI-Thinking-1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 23.6% and 73.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-4.1 mini or MAI-Thinking-1?

MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 64.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GPT-4.1 mini or MAI-Thinking-1?

MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 71 versus 23.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GPT-4.1 mini or MAI-Thinking-1?

GPT-4.1 mini has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 88.5 versus 85. MAI-Thinking-1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.