Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 vs Grok Code Fast 1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

OpenAI
50.44/100
Margin
12.7pts
← winning
37.77/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 #111 (Supported); Grok Code Fast 1 #189 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 and Grok Code Fast 1 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to GPT-4.1; 0 to Grok Code Fast 1.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
12
GPT-4.1 only
8
Grok Code Fast 1 only
0
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick GPT-4.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok Code Fast 1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-4.1 is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 50.44 to 37.77. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-4.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok Code Fast 1. That is roughly 5.3x on output cost alone. GPT-4.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Grok Code Fast 1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4.1 and Grok Code Fast 1
CategoryGPT-4.1ΔGrok Code Fast 1
CodingGPT-4.154.6Margin 16.2Grok Code Fast 170.8
KnowledgeGPT-4.166.3MarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 1Not measured
MathGPT-4.14.1MarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 1Not measured
Inst. FollowingGPT-4.187.4MarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 1Not measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GPT-4.1B · Grok Code Fast 1
  1. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 54.6%B 70.8%
    Winner: Grok Code Fast 1Δ 16.2
    SWE-bench Verified: GPT-4.1 scored 54.6%; Grok Code Fast 1 scored 70.8%. Grok Code Fast 1 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1Grok Code Fast 1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1$2 input / $8 outputGrok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 outputGrok Code Fast 1 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1108 tok/sGrok Code Fast 1172 tok/sGrok Code Fast 1 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.11.02 sGrok Code Fast 12.81 sGPT-4.1 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.11MGrok Code Fast 1256KGPT-4.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Grok Code Fast 1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 47.1%75.7%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
Gert LabsSource 25.65%Not comparable
CodingGrok Code Fast 1 wins
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Grok Code Fast 1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 54.6%70.8%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 38.1%36.2%GPT-4.1 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Grok Code Fast 1Result
AA-LCRSource 61.0%48.3%GPT-4.1 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Grok Code Fast 1Result
MMLUSource 90.2%Not comparable
GPQASource 66.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.4%21.6%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 66.6%72.7%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-HLESource 4.6%7.5%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -36.2%-36.0%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.2%23.8%GPT-4.1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 79.6%78.5%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Grok Code Fast 1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 5.517%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Grok Code Fast 1Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 61.2%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1068Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Grok Code Fast 1Result
IFEvalSource 87.4%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 43.0%41.4%GPT-4.1 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GPT-4.1 or Grok Code Fast 1?

GPT-4.1 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 50.44 to 37.77. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 54.6% and 70.8%.

Which is better for coding, GPT-4.1 or Grok Code Fast 1?

Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.8 versus 54.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026